Pubdate: Thu, 08 Dec 2011 Source: Austin American-Statesman (TX) Copyright: 2011 Austin American-Statesman Contact: http://www.statesman.com/default/content/feedback/lettersubmit.html Website: http://www.statesman.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/32 Author: Suzanne Wills, Special Contributor Note: Wills, a Dallas resident, is speakers' bureau coordinator for the Drug Policy Forum of Texas. http://www.dpft.org TIME TO END ENDLESS WAR ON DRUGS When President Richard Nixon created the Drug Enforcement Administration by executive order 40 years ago, the promise was a diminishing market for illegal drugs and a decrease in crime and violence. The reality has been much different. In the early 1970s very few Americans had ever used an Illegal drug. Now nearly half of us have. Illegal drugs are available to anyone willing to pursue them. The violence in producing countries in Central and South America and transit countries such as Mexico and the Caribbean has increased to the point that it threatens the stability of some governments. We have spent over $1 trillion on the ever escalating drug war. Ironically, the only drug that has decreased in use is tobacco. The United Nations and the United States work to force all countries to adhere to the same drug laws and policies regardless of logic or outcome. Nevertheless, a few countries have tried different approaches. From the beginning, the Netherlands tolerated sales of marijuana for personal use in their famous "coffee shops." The Dutch now use marijuana at about half the rate of Americans. The rates of cocaine and heroin use in the Netherlands are far lower than here. In 1994, the Swiss began giving injectable doses of heroin to addicts at certified medical centers. Crime among the addicts decreased markedly, employment increased and their health improved dramatically. Portugal decriminalized all drugs in 2001 and put the money saved on law enforcement into education and medical treatment. Crime, drug use by teenagers, HIV, overdoses and heroin use all declined. Fifteen U.S. states have decriminalized possession of marijuana. They have about the same rates of cannabis use as the other states. Sixteen states and the District of Columbia have voted to allow use of marijuana as a medicinal herb. They have not experienced an increase in use among the young or increased crime. In spite of evidence that alternative approaches can be useful drug prohibition laws remain entrenched. Nixon appointed the National Commission on Marihuana and Drug Abuse, then ignored its recommendations, as well as this prescient observation: "Perhaps the major consequence of ... well-meaning efforts to do something about drug use ... has been the creation of a vested interest in the perpetuation of the problem among those dispensing and receiving funds." Forty years later the funds have increased exponentially and the vested interests distort public policy in a myriad of ways. Federal anti-drug grants and asset forfeiture policies have made pursuing low-level drug dealers and users a top priority for police departments. Meanwhile, clearance rates for violent crimes are abysmally low. Homicide clearance has dropped from 91 percent in 1965 to 65 percent today. Defense contractors lobbied vigorously for the Andean Counterdrug Initiative and the Merida Initiative. These programs pay for transport helicopters, surveillance aircraft and other military equipment as well as spraying crops with herbicide. More than $10 billion has been spent. Private security contractors hire multiple lobbying firms and receive billions from the federal government to carry out global counternarcotics activities. Since the early 1970s, the United States has built the largest prison system in the history of the world. Americans are imprisoned at seven times the rate of Europeans. The liquor industry financed the opposition to California's Proposition 19 in 2010 which would have legalized marijuana for adult use.The pharmaceutical industry does a massive amount of lobbying. It has a strong financial interest in making cannabis legal only as a pharmaceutical product, not as a plant. The "War on Drugs" is more disruptive and destructive than the drugs themselves. It has increased drug use, eroded our civil rights, skewed policing and funding priorities, put control of dangerous drugs in the hands of criminals and threatened democracy throughout our hemisphere. Reform organizations, religious groups, medical associations, the NAACP and leaders such as President Jimmy Carter, Kofi Annan and the former presidents of Brazil, Colombia and Mexico have all advocated for changes in drug policy. The responsible course of action for the federal government is to allow countries and states to adopt the policies their citizens deem appropriate and just. Wills, a Dallas resident, is speakers' bureau coordinator for the Drug Policy Forum of Texas. www.dpft.org" - --- MAP posted-by: Jo-D