Pubdate: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 Source: Summit Daily News (CO) Copyright: 2011 Summit Daily News Contact: http://apps.summitdaily.com/forms/letter/index.php Website: http://www.summitdaily.com/home.php Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/587 Author: Alex Miller Referenced: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v11/n709/a01.html USE, ABUSE AND MIXED MESSAGES In last Friday's Daily, regular columnist Jeff McAbee hit a few nerves when he took up the touchy topic of high school drug and alcohol use. Jeff, who also happens to be a campus supervisor at Summit High, remarked on his experience of finding a couple of empty beer cans in the boys' restroom, as well as the fact that a former student was recently arrested after allegedly selling pot in the high school. In what I thought was a well-written and thoughtful essay on use and abuse, Jeff made a point to note that not all SHS students are up to no good, and remarked on some of the hypocrisy that accompanies our messages as parents to our children. Was Jeff wrong to touch this topic? It was interesting to see some student responses in letters to the editor. One student, the editor of the school newspaper, blasted Jeff for daring suggest SHS students are anything but angels, while another decried what he sees as wide-spread abuse in school and suggested draconian measures for stemming it. As a former SHS student myself who's also had three children pass through those halls, I printed Jeff's column with no misgivings. While use and abuse of drugs, alcohol and tobacco are a factor in any high school, it's always been more of a problem up here, where a party and vacation mentality reign and even the signs welcoming folks to Summit proclaim us to be a "playground" (something I protested vehemently, to no effect, back in the 1990s when the signs went up). Meanwhile, as we sternly warn kids never to touch any of this stuff until the day they turn 21 (when, magically, they will be able to handle it with adult-like aplomb), we as a society barrage ourselves with an endless stream of ads promoting the very products we proscribe for our kids. As the Summit Prevention Alliance folks and others are now taking pains to point out, this extends to insidious efforts by the tobacco industry to create and market new products targeted at children. And let's not forget Big Alcohol, forever creating more high-powered quaffs no doubt aimed, in part, at kids. Whipped-cream-flavored vodka, anyone? In the face of all that, our institutional message to kids is akin to the abstinence approach to sex: Don't ever do it (until magical age or status is reached), period. Human nature being what it is and kids being kids, the best way to pique interest in something is to issue a blanket condemnation like this. Parents operating on a more realistic playing field can and should do more: We can talk frankly about sex and procure birth control when the time comes. We can also share with our older children what we know about alcohol and drugs. Assuming we're not angels, either, most of us can relate with real-world anecdotes the difference between, say, drinking a beer and downing a brimming cup of Everclear punch. Not all things in the category "drugs" are the same, and there is a difference between smoking a joint and mainlining heroin. And here are 47 excellent reasons to never, ever try meth or cocaine. As parents, we spend a lot of time trying to prepare our kids for life, but we often fall down on these uncomfortable topics that can have the gravest of consequences. Shying away from sex education and getting all squeamish about birth control results in a lot of teen pregnancies, while sending mixed messages about drugs and alcohol (one in the same, really: the distinction and split legality is part of the problem) almost assures negative results when our kids start confronting these substances outside the home. So to the young Tiger Tracks editor who called Jeff's column "smut" and "a disgrace," I would say this: If you'd like to continue in journalism, embrace those who have the courage in print to speak uncomfortable truths. Debate the issue, for sure, but don't vilify the writer. For the other student who suggested having "drug dogs" sniffing around at the school daily, consider the slippery slope of such an action, particularly as it relates to your rights as an American under the Constitution. And finally, county commissioners, can we make at least one small gesture and take down those stupid "Colorado's Playground" signs? - --- MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom