Pubdate: Sun, 18 Dec 2011
Source: Seattle Times (WA)
Copyright: 2011 The Seattle Times Company
Contact:  http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/409
Author: Neal Peirce
Note: Neal Peirce's column appears regularly on editorial pages of The Times.

PRESIDENT OBAMA'S PUZZLING SILENCE ON MARIJUANA POLICY

The Youth Vote Helped Propel Barack Obama to the Presidency, but That 
Enthusiasm Has Declined Sharply, Writes Neal Peirce. One Issue Might 
Reignite Youthful Enthusiasm: Marijuana - Partly Its Medical Use, but 
Especially Americans' Right to Recreational Use Free of Potential Arrest.

WASHINGTON - "Dance with the One that Brought You" is the title of a 
well-known song. But the Urban Dictionary offers a deeper meaning: 
"The principle that someone should pay proper fealty to those who 
have gone out of their way to look after them."

Barack Obama should pay attention. In 2008, young voters were 
enthused and turned out for him by the millions.

But now? The campus/youth enthusiasm factor has declined sharply. The 
deficiency seriously imperils Obama's re-election effort.

There's one issue, though, that might reignite youthful enthusiasm. 
That issue is marijuana - partly its medical use, but especially 
Americans' right to recreational use free of potential arrest and 
possible prison time.

Today's grim reality is that police continue to arrest youth for 
marijuana possession by the hundreds of thousands. But each arrest is 
a red flag of danger, threatening life prospects for a young man or 
woman suddenly saddled with a permanent "drug arrest" record that's 
easily located by employers, landlords, schools, credit agencies and banks.

Small wonder then that 62 percent of young Americans (ages 18 to 29) 
now favor legalizing marijuana, as a Gallup poll reported.

And it's not just youth these days. Gallup this year found 50 percent 
nationwide support for legalizing marijuana use - the most ever, up 
from a measly 12 percent in 1969 to 30 percent in 2000 and 40 percent in 2009.

A ballot measure to legalize, regulate and tax marijuana received 
46.5 percent of the vote in California last year. Parallel measures 
are likely to be on the 2012 ballots in Colorado and Washington. Odd 
political bedfellows - Reps. Barney Frank, D-Mass., and Ron Paul, 
R-Texas - recently introduced a legalization bill and now have 19 
co-sponsors. Paul even gets applause advocating legalization in 
Republican presidential debates.

But what about President Obama? In 2004 he endorsed marijuana 
decriminalization. He was candid about his early pot use and in 2006 
told a group of magazine editors: "When I was a kid, I inhaled, 
frequently." By his run for president in 2008, he was slipping away 
from decriminalization but at least talked of a "public health" 
approach, emphasizing drug treatment instead of prison, giving 
drug-reform advocates hope for a new day in national policy.

But Obama as president has been a clear disappointment to reform 
forces. In White House-initiated electronic town halls, respondents - 
heavily weighted to original Obama supporters - have repeatedly put 
marijuana at the top of their issue lists. But the White House has 
either laughed off or provided dismissive retorts.

Obama's Drug Policy Office claims the drug war is over, replaced by a 
focus on shrinking demand, "innovative, compassionate and 
evidence-based drug policies." But Obama has not once singled out 
marijuana - a substance arguably far less harmful to the human body 
than alcohol - for special consideration. Nor has he spoken to the 
harm to youth caused by 800,000 yearly arrests. Or moved to stem the 
billions of dollars a year spent on marijuana-related arrests.

This is clearly not the "change" Obama's enthusiastic supporters of 
2008 expected. And it's deeply ironic. Ethan Nadelmann of the Drug 
Policy Alliance notes that if local police departments had been 
enforcing marijuana laws as harshly in the early 1980s as many do 
today, "there's a good chance a young Columbia student named Barack 
Obama could have been picked up - and not be in the White House today."

Nadelmann suggests that both the White House Drug Policy Office and 
the Justice Department enforcement divisions have been "co-opted" by 
holdover appointees deeply invested in anti-marijuana rhetoric and 
"let's just bust them" drug enforcement.

Facing the 2012 election, Obama is not likely to advocate, suddenly, 
marijuana decriminalization. But he could announce that it's time for 
a serious national dialogue on the issue, and that it will be a 
hallmark of his second term. He could express his dismay that 800,000 
people, mostly young (and heavily black and Hispanic), are being 
arrested each year for marijuana possession - even as 50 percent of 
Americans favor legalization. He could focus on the massive costs of 
enforcement, the deep social costs of imprisonment. Let all America, 
youth included, join in the debate, he could urge.

A new openness to marijuana reform could help to reignite, on 
campuses and among high numbers of young people, the hope for 
"change" that really means something. Perhaps even prospects for the 
president's own re-election.
- ---
MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom