Pubdate: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 Source: Grunion Gazette (Long Beach, CA) Copyright: 2012 Grunion Gazette Contact: http://www.gazettes.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/3434 Author: Jonathan Van Dyke COUNCIL TO VOTE ON MEDICAL MARIJUANA BAN The California Supreme Court will take another 30 days to decide whether to preside over Long Beach's medical marijuana ordinance debate -- but the City Council still is scheduled to vote on a ban next Tuesday. In December, the City Council discussed at length the potential to pass a ban on all medical marijuana collectives, but found itself in a deadlock 4-4 vote with First District Councilman Robert Garcia absent. Eventually, the measure was delayed until next Tuesday, Jan. 17. The City Attorney's Office had requested that the California Supreme Court take on the Pack v. City of Long Beach case that nullified the city's current ordinance -- specifically a lottery and permitting process. The court announced it will take its allowed extra 30 days to decide -- it must make a decision now by Feb. 8. Some people said they have hoped the Supreme Court would take up the case in order to provide clarity on the medical marijuana issue across the state. "I've been through this (process) many times, and a lot of people see that extension as saying that they're really thinking about it, but I think it's more of a workload issue," City Attorney Robert Shannon said. "I don't think it's indicating a good thing or a bad thing." Advocates for medical marijuana, at the very least, said they are asking the City Council to wait until the Supreme Court figures out what it is going to do. During Tuesday's council meeting, there will be no public comment period, because that was taken during the December meeting before the vote was delayed. "We are hopeful and concerned," said Carl Kemp, spokesperson for the Long Beach Collective Association. "We are hopeful the council will see the prudence in simply waiting the three or four weeks for the Supreme Court's decision." The Long Beach Collective Association and Patients First, a nonprofit part of Citizens for the Fair Treatment of the Disabled, have agreed to form an alliance to lobby against a full ban. Matthew Pappas, the attorney representing Pack, also is working as the spokesman for Patients First. Pappas said he has filed emergency motions in the Appellate Court and Supreme Court, should the city pass a ban, in order to try and stop the city from preventing people from getting their medicine. He said there is no good reason for the city to enact a ban before letting the legal system figure things out. On the other side of the issue, Shannon and said the city's hands are tied unless it enacts a ban. "Our ordinance is in limbo," he said. "We can't enforce it and effectively regulate these businesses. (We need the ban) at least for the interim, until this is clarified." Police Chief Jim McDonnell is expected to testify, as he has said in the past, that his department is in favor of a complete ban. Officials and advocates both said new collectives have opened around the city since the initial court ruling struck the medical marijuana ordinance down. Should a ban go in place, Kemp said it was likely the city would face a multitude of lawsuits. "But we'd rather not have this go to court," he added, noting that Long Beach Collective Association members were willing to comply voluntarily with the city's original ordinance, a difference between them and "renegade" collectives that have cropped up again. The city collected more than $500,000 in fees for the lottery process, money that may have to be refunded at some point. "Depending on what is done, as staff we'll have to figure out how to handle those issues and probably others," Assistant City Attorney Mike Mais said. - --- MAP posted-by: Keith Brilhart