Pubdate: Thu, 12 Jan 2012
Source: Gilmer Mirror, The (TX)
Copyright: 2012 The Gilmer Mirror
Contact:  http://www.gilmermirror.com/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/3032
Author: John W. Whitehead
Note: Whitehead is founder and president of The Rutherford Institute.

America's Longest Ongoing War: The 'Race' War on Drugs

"The drug war is not to protect the children, save the babies, shield 
the neighborhoods, or preserve the rain forests. The drug war is a 
violent campaign against black men and by extension the black family, 
among many others."- Wilton D. Alston, "How Can Anyone Not Realize 
the War on (Some) Drugs Is Racist?" LewRockwell.com (June 24, 2011)

After more than 40 years and at least $1 trillion, America's 
so-called "war on drugs" ranks as the longest-running, most expensive 
and least effective war effort by the American government. Four 
decades after Richard Nixon declared that "America's public enemy No. 
1 in the United States is drug abuse," drug use continues unabated, 
the prison population has increased six fold to over two million 
inmates (half a million of whom are there for nonviolent drug 
offenses), SWAT team raids for minor drug offenses have become more 
common, and in the process, billions of tax dollars have been squandered.

Just consider-every 19 seconds, someone in the U.S. is arrested for 
violating a drug law. Every 30 seconds, someone in the U.S. is 
arrested for violating a marijuana law, making it the fourth most 
common cause of arrest in the United States. Approximately 1,313,673 
individuals were arrested for drug-related offenses in 2011. Police 
arrested an estimated 858,408 persons for marijuana violations in 
2009. Of those charged with marijuana violations, approximately 89 
percent were charged with possession only. Since 1971, more than 40 
million individuals have been arrested due to drug-related offenses. 
Moreover, since December 31, 1995, the U.S. prison population has 
grown an average of 43,266 inmates per year, with about 25 percent 
sentenced for drug law violations.

The foot soldiers in the government's increasingly fanatical war on 
drugs, particularly marijuana, are state and local police officers 
dressed in SWAT gear and armed to the hilt. These SWAT teams carry 
out roughly 50,000 no-knock raids every year in search of illegal 
drugs and drug paraphernalia. As author and journalist Radley Balko 
reports, "The vast majority of these raids are to serve routine drug 
warrants, many times for crimes no more serious than possession of 
marijuana... Police have broken down doors, screamed obscenities, and 
held innocent people at gunpoint only to discover that what they 
thought were marijuana plants were really sunflowers, hibiscus, 
ragweed, tomatoes, or elderberry bushes. (It's happened with all five.)"

No wonder America's war on drugs has increasingly become an issue of 
concern on and off the campaign trail. Back in 1976, Jimmy Carter 
campaigned for president on a platform that included decriminalizing 
marijuana and ending federal criminal penalties for possession of up 
to one ounce of the drug. Thirty-six years later, the topic is once 
again up for debate, especially among Republican presidential 
contenders whose stances vary widely, from Ron Paul who has called 
for an end to the drug war, to Govs. Rick Perry and Jon Huntsman who 
have said that states should be allowed to legalize medical marijuana 
without federal interference, to Rick Santorum who has admitted to 
using marijuana while in college but remains adamantly opposed to its 
legalization.

Americans are showing themselves to be increasingly receptive to a 
change in the nation's drug policy, with a Gallup poll showing a 
record-high 50% of Americans favoring legalizing marijuana use, 
nearly half of all Americans favor legalizing the possession of small 
amounts of marijuana for personal use, 70% favoring legalizing it for 
medical purposes, and a 2008 Zogby poll which found that three in 
four Americans believe the war on drugs to be a failure. "As an 
active duty jail superintendent, I've seen how the drug war doesn't 
do anything to reduce drug abuse but does cause a host of other 
problems, from prison overcrowding to a violent black market 
controlled by gangs and cartels," said Richard Van Wickler, the 
serving corrections superintendent in Cheshire County, N.H. "For a 
long time this issue has been treated like a third rail by 
politicians, but polls now show that voters overwhelmingly agree that 
the drug war is a failure and that a new direction i! s sorely needed."

A growing number of law enforcement officials and national 
organizations are also calling for an end to the drug wars, including 
the US Conference of Mayors, the Global Commission on Drug Policy, 
which includes former UN Secretary General Kofi Annan, former US 
Secretary of State George Schultz, and former presidents of Mexico, 
Colombia, and Brazil, and the NAACP. In fact, at their national 
convention in July 2011, the NAACP voiced their concern over the 
striking disparity in incarceration between whites and blacks, 
particularly when it comes to drug-related offenses.

In terms of its racial impact, the U.S. government's war on drugs 
also constitutes one of the most racially discriminatory policies 
being pushed by the government in recent decades, with 
African-Americans constituting its greatest casualties. As the ACLU 
has reported, "Despite the fact that whites engage in drug offenses 
at a higher rate than African-Americans, African-Americans are 
incarcerated for drug offenses at a rate that is 10 times greater 
than that of whites." Indeed, blacks-who make up 13% of the 
population-account for 40% of federal prisoners and 45% of state 
prisoners convicted of drug offenses.

Moreover, a November 2011 study by researchers at Duke University 
found that young blacks are arrested for drug crimes ten times more 
often than whites. Likewise, a 2008 study by the ACLU concluded that 
blacks in New York City were five times more likely to be arrested 
than their white counterparts for simple marijuana possession. 
Latinos were three times more likely to be arrested. The Drug Policy 
Alliance and California NAACP released a report claiming that between 
2006 and 2008 "police in 25 of California's major cities arrested 
blacks at four, five, six, seven, and even 12 times the rate of whites."

This disproportionate approach to prosecuting those found in 
possession of marijuana is particularly evident in California, where 
black marijuana offenders were imprisoned 13 times as much as 
non-blacks in 2011. In fact, between 1990 and 2010, there was a 300% 
surge in arrests for marijuana possession for nonwhites. As the 
Center on Juvenile and Criminal Justice concluded, "California's 
criminal justice system can be divided into two categories with 
respect to marijuana: one system for African-Americans, another for 
all other races."

Thus, while the government's war on drugs itself may not be an 
explicit attempt to subjugate minority groups, the policy has a 
racist effect in that it disproportionately impacts minority 
communities. Moreover, the origins of drug prohibition have 
explicitly racial justifications. In the late 19th and early 20th 
centuries, prohibitionists clamoring to make drugs illegal tapped 
into common racial prejudices to convince others of the benefits of 
drug prohibition. For example, opium imports to America peaked in the 
1840s, with 70,000 pounds imported annually, but Chinese immigrants 
did not arrive in large numbers until after the 1850s. Thus, 
Americans were using opium in copious amounts before Chinese 
immigrants arrived. Once they arrived however, they became convenient 
scapegoats for those interested in making opium illegal. 
Prohibitionists portrayed opium smoking as a habit below the 
respectability of "white" men. In a similar manner, marijuana was 
later ass! ociated with blacks, Latinos, and jazz culture, making 
marijuana an easy target for prohibition.

Yet despite 40 years of military funding to eradicate foreign drug 
supplies, increased incarceration rates, and more aggressive 
narcotics policing, the war on drugs has done nothing to resolve the 
issue of drug addiction. Consumption of cocaine and marijuana has 
been relatively stable over the past four decades, with a spike in 
use during the 1970s and 80s. And a European Union Commission study 
determined that "global drug production and use remained largely 
unchanged from 1998 through 2007." In fact, the only things that have 
changed are that drugs are cheaper and more potent, there are more 
people in prison, and the government is spending more taxpayer money.

So what's the solution?

As Professor John McWhorter contends, problems of addiction should be 
treated like the medical problems they are-in other words, drug 
addiction is a health problem, not a police problem. At the very 
least, marijuana, which has been widely recognized as medically 
beneficial, should be legalized. As a society, we would be far better 
off investing the copious amounts of money currently spent on law 
enforcement in prevention and treatment programs. Of course, the 
pharmaceutical industry doesn't want marijuana legalized, fearing it 
might cut into its profit margins. However, as California has shown, 
it could be a boon for struggling state economies. Marijuana is 
California's biggest cash crop, responsible for $14 billion a year in 
sales. Were California to legalize the drug (it legalized medical 
marijuana in 1996) and allow the state to regulate and tax its sale, 
tax collectors estimate it could bring in $1.3 billion in revenue. 
Prior to the Obama administratio! n's crackdown on the state's 
medical marijuana dispensaries, which has cost the state thousands of 
jobs, lost income and lost tax revenue, California had been raking in 
$100 million in taxes from the dispensaries alone.

As Neill Franklin, the executive director of Law Enforcement Against 
Prohibition who worked on narcotics policing for the Maryland State 
Police and Baltimore Police Department for over 30 years, remarked in 
the New York Times:

In an earlier era it may have been a smart move for politicians to 
act "tough on drugs" and stay far away from legalization. But today, 
many voters recognize that our prohibition laws don't do anything to 
reduce drug use but do create a black market where cartels and gangs 
use violence to protect their profits.

While some fear that legalization would lead to increased use, those 
who want to use marijuana are probably already doing so under our 
ineffective prohibition laws. And when we stop wasting so many 
resources on locking people up, perhaps we can fund real public 
education and health efforts of the sort that have led to dramatic 
reductions in tobacco use over the last few decades - all without 
having to put handcuffs on anyone.

I have spent my entire adult life fighting the war on drugs as a 
police officer on the front lines. I have experienced the loss of 
friends and comrades who fought this war alongside me, and every year 
tens of thousands of other people are murdered by gangs battling over 
drug turf in American cities, Canada and Mexico. It is time to reduce 
violence by taking away a vital funding source from organized crime 
just as we did by ending alcohol prohibition almost 80 years ago.

The goals of reducing crime, disease, death and addiction have not 
been met by the "drug war" that was declared by President Nixon 40 
years ago and ramped up by each president since.

The public has waked up to the fact that we need to change our 
marijuana laws. Savvy politicians would do well to catch up.
- ---
MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom