Pubdate: Wed, 16 May 2012 Source: Petoskey News-Review (MI) Copyright: 2012 Petoskey News-Review Contact: http://www.petoskeynews.net/forms/lettertotheeditor.html Website: http://www.petoskeynews.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/4115 REP'S BILL: TEST CEO'S FOR ILLEGAL DRUGS IF THEY WANT TAXPAYER 'WELFARE' A bipartisan collection of lawmakers is telling their fellow Michigan House representatives that fair is fair when it comes to government handouts and drug testing. Executives and presidents of companies accepting "corporate welfare" from the state would be tested for illegal drugs under legislation sponsored by Rep. Tom McMillin, R-Rochester Hills. It has the support of at least three other Republicans and a Democrat. McMillin said he sponsored the bill in response to proposed legislation that would require social welfare recipients to pass a drug test to qualify for assistance. He also happens to have an intense dislike for taxpayer-funded gratis to the corporate world. "It is more than a statement," McMillin told Michigan State University's Capital News Service. "If we end up going down that road with greater discussion about drug testing welfare recipients, I will be very bold in making sure that this gets into that debate, and will not rest until we treat corporate welfare the same as social welfare." This bill would affect companies that receive loans and grants from the Michigan Strategic Fund. The strategic fund is administered by the Michigan Economic Development Corp., and supports business development, community development and state marketing activities, including promotion of tourism, film industry and arts and cultural affairs. The legislation would take effect only if the similar welfare benefits bill passes. The bill is in committee. Asked about its chances of even making it past committee phase, McMillin reiterated to the Petoskey News-Review that he plans to push this issue, hard. He sees strategic fund programs as take money from businesses and taxpayers and give it -- thanks to connections and lobbyists - for unfair advantage to competitors. "We never talk of the cost, the money out of pocket. It's hard to argue drug testing people for $400-$500 a month (receiving in aid) when we are giving out millions of dollars. "Those companies I don't have much affinity for. The vast majority make it on their own and just want government to get out of their way." McMillin strikes a nerve when he argues that companies which pay their taxes end up helping pay for their competitors to have an economic advantage. Welfare benefits and corporate tax breaks and incentives are not the same thing, but we can see why McMillin calls them both handouts. We appreciate McMillin's position and are tired of some politicians in our state thinking that struggling single mothers are somehow all drug-addled second-class citizens because they need state assistance. Yet when a corporation holds its hand out for millions, why, that's called job creation. It's House Bill 5527 -- short, sweet and to the point. It's one to watch. - --- MAP posted-by: Matt