Pubdate: Sun, 15 Jul 2012 Source: Arkansas Democrat-Gazette (Little Rock, AR) Copyright: 2012 Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Inc. Contact: http://www2.arkansasonline.com/contact/voicesform/ Website: http://www2.arkansasonline.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/25 Note: Accepts letters to the editor from Arkansas residents only Author: Tracie Dungan MEDICAL PROFESSION GIVES MARIJUANA MIXED REVIEWS Prominent Local Cancer Patient a Reluctant User Cancer patient Emily Williams initially resisted the idea of using marijuana for the severe nausea and pain that came along with her chemotherapy two years ago. "Before I did my first treatment, I had someone offer to get some ' pot' for me, and I said no," Williams, 55, of Fayetteville said recently. "For all the obvious reasons." One of them was the mere thought of using an illegal drug in the home she shares with her husband, Kit Williams, the city attorney for Fayetteville. Now Emily Williams finds herself a somewhat reluctant advocate for the movement in Arkansas to get medical marijuana before voters. The Arkansas Medical Marijuana Act would legalize cannabis for treatment of a list of a dozen diseases, including cancer, as well as conditions that produce certain debilitating symptoms. A group called Arkansans for Compassionate Care submitted 67,883 signatures to the state July 5 to get the petition submitted for the November ballot. Williams is listed as a featured patient on the group's website, arcompassion.org. Only 36,495 of the signatures submitted belong to registered voters, the secretary of state's office said Friday. The group was given 30 days to collect 28,918 additional signatures. Diagnosed with stage 3 lymphoma in 2010, Williams experienced cancer-related pain in her lungs and back. Her chemotherapy brought severe nausea, headaches and pain in her muscles and joints. A medication that triggers white-blood-cell production caused further pain in her bones, she said. In the hours after the first of her six chemo treatments, she was determined to rely on medicines doctors had given her to relieve her symptoms. "I tried to tough it out," Williams said. After one oral medication didn't work for pain, she tried a second the doctor had given her. By early evening, she was throwing up. "The headache was so blinding," she said. "I couldn't get off the couch." Williams stuck it out until 9:30 p.m., then called the person who'd earlier offered her marijuana. After she smoked it, the relief was almost immediate. "Within 10 to 15 minutes, my headache was gone. My nausea was gone," Williams said. "I wasn't hurting. And really for me, the remarkable thing was I went to bed and was able to sleep for four hours. "And that was the most I'd been able to sleep for probably two months." Though she continued to try to use pain medication the oncologists gave her, "I ended up using [ marijuana] throughout my entire chemo," Williams said. LACK OF STUDIES Gov. Mike Beebe has recently said that he will not vote in favor of legalizing marijuana for medical use, should the issue make it to the ballot. But he won't campaign against it either, said Beebe spokesman Matt DeCample. "He said he had concerns that the law would be abused," DeCample said Thursday. Alan J. Budney, who left the psychiatry faculty at the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences in Little Rock in June, said he can understand why cancer patients try marijuana when prescription medicines fail them. The lack of sufficient studies on its use, however, means he cannot be swayed to supporting it. While the cannabis plant and its cannabinoids have demonstrated "lots of possibilities" for medicine - particularly in settling people's stomachs - long-term clinical trials involving hundreds of patients from wide demographic groups haven't been done, he said. "There's just very, very little literature that is clinical, and there are no definitive studies that are clinical," said Budney, who worked in UAMS' Center for Addiction Research. He's now at the Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College in New Hampshire. What studies there are haven't distinguished between street marijuana, research marijuana grown by the government for such studies and the active ingredient in the plant known as THC, he said. It takes comprehensive trials to determine effectiveness, dosage, side effects and overall safety, he said. "You know, alcohol is helpful for pain, too," he said. "Ever have a few drinks and your pain is gone?" While smoking and intravenous needles are "superdelivery systems" that get a drug to the brain quickly, most prescription drugs are not smoked or injected, Budney said. With smoking, it's virtually impossible to have a doctor instruct a patient on how to inhale and get the right dose. ALTERNATIVE DELIVERIES For her part, Williams said, the smoking hurt, but not nearly as much as the pain. She went online, then asked around, and discovered a better way to take marijuana, and that also lasted longer. "Just melt butter in a pan, throw in your crumpled-up 'pot' in the butter, and cook it for about 30 or 40 minutes," she said. She refrigerated it and spread it on crackers or toast. Budney said other delivery systems are being researched globally but in the U.S., any kind of marijuana as-medicine research seems to be a harder sell. "Does a drug company want to spend $ 10 million researching an illegal drug?" he said. Elsewhere, "There are people working on this as an aerosol, where you squirt it," he said. In Canada and some other countries, Sativex, which contains THC, has been approved as a mouth spray, he said. In January, the New York Daily News reported that the British drug maker GW Pharma was in advanced clinical trials for what it touts as the world's first drug developed from raw marijuana rather than synthetically derived equivalents, and that it hoped for U.S. approval for cancer pain treatment by late 2013. Dr. Joe McSherry, a neurologist at the University of Vermont College of Medicine who's followed cannabis research closely since 2000, said he favors medical marijuana use, though he agrees with Budney on the lack of studies in this country. "Doctors haven't been educated on this," McSherry said. "There have been literally thousands of articles since 2000, research articles, mostly done in Europe." Studies on mice show that cannabis "reduces the toxic input of pain signals" at the spinal cord level, he said. But marijuana works on a second level as well, affecting separate pain pathways from the brain to the spinal cord, inhibiting transmission. "Pain is a complicated thing," McSherry said. It's a combination of what you actually feel and your emotional response to that feeling, he said. The cannabis works on both: "It makes it so you're not so afraid, or not so anxious, about the pain." Unlike opiates, which can put someone to sleep, marijuana can control pain without the intoxication that disrupts someone's daily activities, he said. According to ProCon.org, which says it is an independent, nonprofit public charity, 17 states and Washington D.C. have legalized medical marijuana as of June 1. McSherry and a Fayetteville nephrologist, Dr. David Crittenden, said medical use of marijuana is good public policy. "It's a useful drug from what I've read," Crittenden said, referring to the treatment of certain conditions and chronic pain. "The reason there hasn't been more study of the use of the drug in the United States [is because] the government who funds most research either directly or indirectly hasn't let people study it," Crittenden said. "And it's illegal to give it to people." McSherry added that the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration won't allow cannabis research unless it's approved by the National Institutes of Health's National Institute on Drug Abuse. The drug abuse institute's leader has said its mission statement doesn't cover "finding beneficial use of drugs of abuse." In Arkansas, the group that submitted signatures to put the issue on the ballot said it is continuing to collect them even as the state continues verifying the first petitions submitted. Ryan Denham, campaign director for Arkansans for Compassionate Care, said that while the group needed only 62,507 signatures, it wanted to collect substantially more. Without the extended effort: "We're definitely going to be short," Denham said. - --- MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom