Pubdate: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 Source: Helena Independent Record (MT) Copyright: 2012 Helena Independent Record Contact: http://helenair.com/app/contact/letters_to_editor/ Website: http://helenair.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/1187 Author: Sanjay Talwani SUPREME COURT REJECTS HAVRE MAN'S UNUSUAL MEDICAL MARIJUANA APPEAL The Montana Supreme Court Tuesday turned to the lyrics of Bob Dylan in denying the appeal of a Havre man who mentioned counter-culture comedians Cheech and Chong in his appeal of a conviction for growing and intending to distribute marijuana. Shawn M. Stoner was charged with the felonies after authorities found five marijuana plants, additional marijuana, a digital scale and other paraphernalia in his residence. Some time after being charged, Stoner sought and received a card from the state authorizing him as a medical marijuana caregiver for one particular patient, and another certifying him as a patient under the state's medical marijuana law in place at the time. In March 2011, Stoner asked a District Court to dismiss that charge, citing the provision in the law that a "qualifying patient" may use that defense in a criminal case. That court disagreed, noting that he did not possess the card at the time of the crime, and said he could bring that argument before a jury but warning that his burden of proof would be "fairly high." He pleaded guilty in an agreement with prosecutors but reserved his right to appeal on the basis of the medical card, but the high court upheld the lower court's ruling. "They'll stone ya when you're trying to make a buck," Associate Justice Beth Baker wrote for the unanimous five-judge panel, quoting a Dylan song from 1966. "They'll stone you and then they'll say, 'good luck.'" Stoner acknowledged to the high court that it was not the intent of the law "to allow unfettered use of marijuana to every stoner and reject from a Cheech and Chong casting call," referring to comedians Cheech Marin and Tommy Chong, who built their careers on marijuana-oriented humor. "Nor, however, was it (the law's) intent to allow this Stoner, or others like him, an avenue for legalization of their creative endeavors," Baker wrote. "Unfortunately, though clever, his argument cannot prevail. Perhaps Stoner's ingenuity will turn a legitimate profit in the future." - --- MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom