Pubdate: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 Source: Philadelphia Inquirer, The (PA) Copyright: 2012 Philadelphia Newspapers Inc Contact: http://www.philly.com/inquirer/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/340 Author: Andres Oppenheimer Page: A17 BEYOND LEGALIZATION: A BID TO NATIONALIZE MARIJUANA Judging by what Uruguay's President Jose Mujica recently told me in an extended interview, there is a real possibility that people in his country will soon be able to buy marijuana legally from a state-regulated company that will be in charge of marketing and selling the drug. Mujica, 78, submitted a bill to congress earlier this month that may be the boldest marijuana legalization proposal in the world. It calls for the state to "take over the control and regulation of activities related to the importation, production, acquisition, storage, marketing, and distribution of marijuana." This would go well beyond what countries such as the Netherlands and Portugal have done in recent decades to in effect decriminalize marijuana use. It also dwarfs recent proposals by Guatemalan President Otto Perez Molina - and milder versions by the leaders of Colombia and Mexico - to start an open debate about the legalization of drugs. Are you proposing that the state start selling marijuana? I asked Mujica. "It's a little bit more profound than that," he answered. "The idea is to take away the market from drug traffickers." 50-50 chance Mujica explained that, nowadays, drug traffickers who sell marijuana in Uruguay often induce young people to consume heavier drugs, such as cocaine paste. That has caused, among other things, a major rise in violent crime in the country. "We prefer that this market of bland drugs no longer be used as a gateway for the sale of the so-called hard drugs," Mujica said. By regulating Uruguay's estimated $40 million-a-year marijuana business, the state will take it away from drug traffickers and weaken the drug cartels, he said. In addition, the state would be able to keep track of all marijuana consumers in the country and provide treatment to the most serious abusers, as is already being done with alcoholics, he said. Asked whether people would be able to buy marijuana in street cafes or kiosks under his proposal, Mujica said it would be up to the Uruguayan congress to decide that. He added that his bill has a "50-50 chance of passing," but said he hopes a public discussion of it will lead to some version of it being approved soon. What about the criticism that a state-run marijuana company would become an inefficient bureaucracy, with high chances of being corrupted by the drug trade? I asked. Mujica, who until then had refused to reveal whether he supported a state or private firm to run the proposed marijuana enterprise, said that "a private company will sell it" under strict government control, much like what happens today with alcohol sales. In other words, the state would hire a private firm to manage the business. And what about the argument that if this law passes, Uruguay will become a marijuana tourism destination? I asked. "This will be ... for Uruguayans, who will be registered, and who will have a monthly ration" of the drug, he said, adding that foreigners would not be able to buy marijuana under the system. Wouldn't lower marijuana prices lead to an increase in consumption, as happened with alcohol at the end of the U.S. Prohibition era in the 1930s? I asked. Mujica said that's a risk worth taking. When the United States lifted its ban on alcohol, "people at first drank a little bit more, but the fact is that life went on in the United States, and today it's a pretty prosperous nation, isn't it?" he asked. Playing the fools "What we can't afford doing is continuing to play the fools, to look the other way" while consumption of harder drugs and drug-related violence continues, Mujica concluded. "We must try other weapons." When I first read Mujica's proposal to have the state "take over" control of marijuana sales, I feared that Uruguay would create one more inept, state-run bureaucracy filled with government cronies who would probably smoke up the company's income or, worse, sell harder drugs on the side. But if Mujica's plan is, as he said in the interview, to subcontract a reputable private firm to run the business under state regulations - much like scotch or beer companies - the idea may not be that crazy. And the income may help fund education, prevention, and treatment programs for harder drugs. What's clear is that the four-decade-old, U.S.-backed war on drugs is not working, and that it's producing tens of thousands of dead across the hemisphere, without significant reductions in consumption. Experimenting with new weapons to weaken the cartels may be better than doing nothing. - --- MAP posted-by: Matt