Pubdate: Sun, 23 Sep 2012 Source: North County Times (Escondido, CA) Copyright: 2012 North County Times Contact: http://www.nctimes.com/app/forms/letters/index.php Website: http://www.nctimes.com Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/1080 CONVERSATION NEEDED ON MARIJUANA Conflicts between state and federal law are hardly uncommon, and go back to the earliest days of our nation's history. From taxation to the legal rights of escaped slaves, state legislatures and Congress have often been at odds. We see that continuing today with issues ranging from illegal immigration to voter ID laws. And, nearly as contentiously as those issues, with medical marijuana. California voters approved the growing use and not-for-profit sale of marijuana for medical use in 1996. Federal law continues to prohibit the use or possession of marijuana, and federal agents have continued to enforce federal law in California. And yet, even federal pressure provides no excuse for local governments continuing to defy the voters' clearly expressed will ---- something we've seen far too often in the 16 years since Proposition 215 legalized medical pot in California. We've seen county governments sue to overturn the election results, and numerous jurisdictions have dragged their feet in offering guidance to those who would provide or use medical marijuana under Prop. 215. In fact, this election, voters in Del Mar and Solana Beach are being asked to vote on ballot measures that would direct their respective City Councils to draft rules allowing medical marijuana dispensaries in their jurisdictions. Prop. 215 was sloppily written, and provides poor guidance to lawmakers. (It is worth noting that this newspaper opposed Prop. 215, believing its advocacy for medical marijuana was based almost entirely on anecdotal evidence rather than solid medical and scientific research.) But the voters' intent was crystal-clear, and there is nothing to indicate that the electorate feels any differently today. If anything, support for medical use of marijuana is stronger than it was when Prop. 215 was approved. Given this, we urge the state Legislature to draft new regulations for the cultivation and distribution of medical marijuana. We believe that the only rational way to distribute a substance being used for medical purposes is through the existing pharmaceutical infrastructure: The Legislature should do away with the hodgepodge of local regulations allowing for marijuana dispensaries, and institute statewide rules allowing medical marijuana to be sold as a prescription from licensed pharmacies. We realize this presents a direct challenge to federal law and authority ---- and that federal law trumps state and local laws. But with states across the country relaxing their laws regarding medical marijuana, the federal government needs to begin a dialogue about how to approach changing public attitudes on pot. Congress should pass legislation directing the administration to suspend federal enforcement of laws regarding marijuana, and authorize the kind of serious, sober research into marijuana's palliative properties that should have been conducted years ago. The ground is shifting on how our culture perceives marijuana, particularly for medical use, and it's time to force Washington to take part in the ongoing conversation. - --- MAP posted-by: Matt