Pubdate: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 Source: Wall Street Journal (US) Copyright: 2012 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. Contact: http://www.wsj.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/487 Author: Justin Scheck CITY FIGHTS FOR MARIJUANA DISPENSARY OAKLAND, Calif.-This Northern California city is fighting to protect its biggest medical-marijuana dispensary-which generates more than a $1 million in local tax revenue annually-from a federal crackdown on pot shops. Oakland sued U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder and San Francisco U.S. Attorney Melinda Haag on Wednesday in response to a Justice Department civil-forfeiture complaint aiming to seize the building where the Harborside Health Center, a medical-marijuana dispensary, rents space. The pot shop's owner says it sells more than $20 million of marijuana annually. Oakland's lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, is likely the first by a municipality in response to Justice Department moves to shut down marijuana dispensaries in California, Colorado and elsewhere using civil-asset forfeiture laws rather than criminal prosecutions. The case is the latest to highlight the differences between federal law, under which marijuana is illegal, and laws in 17 states that have legalized the sale and use of pot for medical purposes. Oakland's suit asks a judge to strike down "ongoing and threatened attempts by the U.S. Department of Justice to seize real property within the City of Oakland used to provide medical cannabis to patients." It claims the Justice Department is reneging on earlier statements that it wouldn't target medical-marijuana dispensaries that comply with local and state regulations. The city also claims the federal suit should be barred by the five-year statute of limitations on forfeiture cases since federal authorities knew as early as 2006 that Harborside was selling marijuana. A spokesman for Ms. Haag declined to comment. A Justice Department spokeswoman referred to a June 2011 departmental letter giving U.S. attorneys guidance on medical-marijuana enforcement. "It is likely not an efficient use of federal resources to focus enforcement efforts on individuals with cancer or other serious illnesses who use marijuana as part of a recommended treatment regimen consistent with applicable state law, or their caregivers," the letter said. Since that letter went out, U.S. attorneys in California and Colorado have issued more than 400 letters to dispensary owners and their landlords. They mostly focus on large facilities and those near schools, threatening some landlords with legal action and property seizures unless they evict the dispensaries, according to the Justice Department. Many of the targeted dispensaries subsequently have closed, according to the Drug Policy Alliance, a medical-marijuana advocacy group that tracks cases. Civil asset-forfeiture laws have long been used to seize the property of drug dealers and other criminals, often in tandem with criminal prosecutions. In the recent marijuana cases, many forfeiture actions have not been linked to criminal cases A spokesman for the U.S. Attorney's office in Denver said the office was "targeting those marijuana stores that are within 1,000 feet of a school" out of concern for child safety. In the case of Harborside, landlord Ana Chretien responded to a July forfeiture suit by the San Francisco U.S. Attorney's Office by fighting the suit in court; her lawyer said he hoped to work out a settlement with the federal government to keep Harborside open. Oakland City Attorney Barbara Parker said the city took action against the Justice Department to preserve access to marijuana for local patients. If Harborside closes, she said, some people would have to buy marijuana on the black market. She said the city will also be hurt by losing more than $1 million in tax revenue if Harborside is shut down. The city has a special on marijuana dispensaries-5% of their gross sales. - --- MAP posted-by: Matt