Pubdate: Sat, 20 Oct 2012 Source: Vancouver Sun (CN BC) Copyright: 2012 The Vancouver Sun Contact: http://www.canada.com/vancouversun/letters.html Website: http://www.canada.com/vancouversun/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/477 Author: Tobi Cohen NEW RULES FOR VISITORS RAISES PRIVACY ISSUES Bill May Not Get Proper Scrutiny, Critics Say OTTAWA - Critics fear that new border security measures in the latest federal budget bill may force visitors to Canada to reveal whether they're a drug user or have a communicable disease such as gonorrhea. And because the measures are crammed into the sweeping bill that covers many unrelated topics, they may not get proper scrutiny, the critics say. According to the budget implementation bill tabled this week, Canada is set to adopt the Electronic Travel Authorization ( ETA) system by 2015 for people arriving by air from visa-exempt countries, including many European nations. A type of mini visa that could be issued online within minutes, ETAs already exist in the United States. Details about drug use and medical conditions are among the personal details the Americans seek from visitors. While Australia also requires visitors to fill out an ETA, its version appears less invasive. The Canadian initiative is part of the Beyond the Border perimeter security deal with the U. S. The deal signed last year explicitly states the Canadian ETA is to "mirror measures taken in the United States through its Electronic System for Travel Authorization." The federal government argues the new tool will allow Canada to prevent inadmissible travellers such as failed refugee claimants, criminals and people on no-fly lists from entering the country since they'll be stopped before they buy their ticket or board a plane. The government says it will speed up the processing of legitimate travellers and reduce costs related to having to remove inadmissible people after they arrive at the border. Nancy Caron, a spokeswoman for Citizenship and Immigration, said it's too soon to say which questions the Canadian ETA will pose. She said Canada has its own criteria and the questions don't necessarily have to conform to the U. S. version. Critics, however, say this and other border security measures related to the U. S. deal raise all sorts of privacy, sovereignty and trade concerns. "This is just, again, Harper acquiescing to U. S. demands around security and I think that's a problem," said Stuart Trew of the Council of Canadians, which has been critical of the Beyond the Border deal. While government officials suggest 98 per cent of travellers to the U. S. are cleared for entry with no issues, Trew noted the two per cent that aren't can add up to a lot of people and that there's already evidence to suggest there are big problems with U. S. watch lists, against which travellers destined for Canada are likely to be scrutinized. NDP public safety critic Randall Garrison said he supports the "principle" of electronic travel authorization systems which many countries have implemented successfully, but he has concerns about the U. S. version. "This government hasn't demonstrated in the past a great commitment to protection of privacy," Garrison said. "Putting it in this big bill, I'm worried we won't get a chance to actually discuss what exactly is intended and how the information will be used because it won't get proper scrutiny and proper debate by being shoved into an omnibus budget bill." Besides basic biographical, passport and contact information - essentially what the Australians are after - the U. S. form asks would-be visitors if they have a "communicable disease," "physical or mental disorder" or are a "drug abuser or addict." Gonorrhea and syphilis are included among the examples provided and the U. S. government appears to be interested in those with disorders who could "pose a threat" to the "property, safety or welfare" of themselves or others. The form also asks travellers if they've every been "arrested or convicted" of an offence related to "moral turpitude," a controlled substance, drug trafficking or two or more crimes that, combined, could result in a sentence of at least five years. There are questions about potential involvement in espionage, sabotage, terrorist activities and genocide, as well as questions about child custody. Travellers are also required to agree to a "waiver of rights" that precludes them from appealing a negative decision or a removal order, should one be obtained, if they've been found to have "violated" the terms of their admission. An authorization also doesn't guarantee entry to the U. S., as the final decision will rest with the customs officer at the point of entry. The U. S. requires a travel authorization from all travellers, including infants, and charges $ 14 for it. Canadians are exempt from filling out the U. S. form and the same will apply to Americans entering Canada once its system is up and running. The requirement, however, will apply to all those travelling from other visa-exempt countries, including Europeans. - --- MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom