Pubdate: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 Source: Detroit News (MI) Copyright: 2012 The Detroit News Contact: http://www.detroitnews.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/126 Author: Darren A. Nichols MARIJUANA MEASURE DIVIDES DETROITERS Possessing Less Than Ounce Would Be Decriminalized Detroit - A proposal to decriminalize small amounts of marijuana in Detroit has residents deeply divided over how it would affect a city struggling with high crime and shrinking resources. The ballot question, known as Proposal M, would allow adults over age 21 to possess less than an ounce of marijuana on personal property without criminal prosecution. It's one of six issues facing city voters Nov. 6. The proposal splits Detroiters. Proponents say Detroit, a city that's among the most violent in the country and is in the midst of a financial crisis, no longer has the police resources to go after people smoking small amounts of marijuana at home. "We don't believe that a person peacefully using marijuana should be treated as a criminal. Marijuana possession should not be a crime," said Tim Beck, chairman of the Coalition for a Safer Detroit. But others counter that the proposal signals the city is soft on crime and gives in to a growing culture of acceptance about drug use in urban areas. "We don't need Detroit to be any more lawless. The one thing we don't need is a higher Detroit," political analyst Steve Hood said. Michigan voters in 2008 approved the use of marijuana for medical reasons, but parts of the law - including how the drug can be dispensed - are still being challenged in court. It's taken a few years for the Coalition for a Safer Detroit to get the legalization issue on the city ballot. Supporters collected more than 6,000 signatures in 2010, but City Clerk Janice Winfrey refused to put the measure on the ballot. Winfrey cited a conflict with state drug laws that make marijuana illegal. But backers continued to press and sought court relief. A judge ruled in their favor in the spring. Voters in Colorado, Oregon and Washington will cast ballots on similar statewide proposals this year. Denver and Seattle have already made possession of marijuana a low priority. In Michigan, marijuana possession can result in a civil infraction, and Kalamazoo Police also have made it a low priority. "It's nothing terribly radical. It's been done in many other cities," said Beck, a registered medical marijuana user who filed the petitions in 2010. "Detroit just can't afford this type of policing anymore." But Detroit City Council President Pro Tem Gary Brown, a former deputy chief for the Detroit Police Department, said the proposal will "limit one of the tools police officers have in the tool box to enforce the law." "They have the discretion to enforce it or not (now)," said Brown, who worked in the narcotics unit for 15 years. "I'd like them to keep that discretion and enforce the law as it is currently written. "There are a lot of people that support this law because they want to make money off of it. ... It has nothing to do with the wellbeing of our community." About 17.4 million young people over age 12 were current marijuana users, according to a 2010 study by the National Survey on Drug Use and Health. Matt Abel of West Bloomfield, an attorney with offices in Detroit who is helping to push Proposal M, said the effort is "one small step in the path toward ending the prohibition of marijuana." "It won't legalize marijuana (totally) in Detroit," said Abel, who adds the proposal could help Detroit's economy by encouraging the creation of dispensaries. "The problems the city has are not caused or solved by marijuana. The problems are the educational system and secondarily police services. One way to get better police services is they don't need to worry about marijuana," Abel said. But community activist Lawrence Kenyatta is concerned about the message the proposal sends to young people. By Kenyatta's estimate, 70 percent of young men in Detroit believe there's nothing wrong with smoking marijuana. He said that marijuana use contributes to Detroit's high unemployment rate because many young people are failing drug tests. "We're opposed to having marijuana in Detroit - period," Kenyatta said. "We can't afford to jeopardize our young men and women losing employment (opportunities) because they can't pass a drug test." Kenyatta, 56, who works with the Partnership for a Drug Free Detroit, is not related to Detroit City Council member Kwame Kenyatta. Carl Taylor, professor in the sociology department at Michigan State University, said he could understand why people are pushing to legalize marijuana. They typically are people who have a job and understand how to handle the drug, he said. But Taylor warned that legalizing the drug wouldn't be good for Detroit, which has many marijuana smokers who are underemployed and undereducated. "It is something that we cannot afford because it is a major distraction," said Taylor, a Detroit native. "We have a countless number of people who all they do is smoke those trees and they aren't functional. "In a city that should be focusing on strong education and preparing (people) for employment, marijuana is not something that should come into debate." - --- MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom