Pubdate: Sun, 04 Nov 2012
Source: Seattle Times (WA)
Copyright: 2012 The Seattle Times Company
Contact:  http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/409
Author: Rick Steves
Note: Rick Steves writes European travel guidebooks and hosts travel 
shows on public television and public radio. He is based in Edmonds.

WHY I'M VOTING FOR I-502'S SMART APPROACH TO MARIJUANA LEGALIZATION

MARIJUANA use is a serious, expensive and persistent challenge in our 
society. And it's time for a new approach. That's why I'm 
co-sponsoring Initiative 502 on the Nov. 6 ballot, which will 
legalize, tax and regulate marijuana, allowing adults 21 and over to 
buy up to one ounce from state-licensed stores.

Initiative 502 is not pro-pot. Rather, it's anti-prohibition. We 
believe that, like the laws that criminalized alcohol back in the 
1930s, our current laws against marijuana use are causing more harm 
to our society than the drug itself.

Marijuana is a drug. It's not good for you. It can be addictive. But 
marijuana is here to stay. No amount of wishing will bring us a 
utopian drug-free society.

To address this reality, Initiative 502 is a smart law. It has been 
endorsed by the entire Seattle City Council; the mayors of Seattle, 
Tacoma and other cities; the NAACP; the Children's Alliance; and an 
impressive list of well-respected attorneys, judges, law-enforcement 
officials and state legislators.

Marijuana is a huge underground business in our state - estimated to 
be our second-biggest crop, after apples. Untold billions of untaxed 
dollars are enriching gangs and empowering organized crime. We 
believe the safest approach is to bring cannabis out of the black 
market and regulate it. Taxes on the legal sale of marijuana would 
raise, according to government estimates, $500 million a year for our state.

Opponents worry: Will passing Initiative 502 lead to more people 
smoking pot? Surveying societies that have decriminalized marijuana, 
there appears to be no evidence that use goes up with 
decriminalization. For example, in the Netherlands - famous for its 
relaxed marijuana laws - per capita cannabis consumption is about on 
par with the U.S. Use among young Dutch people is actually lower than 
in the U.S.

Speaking of young people, we would do a better job protecting them if 
we brought marijuana under tight regulatory control, taxed it and 
invested more funding in prevention and education, as Initiative 502 
proposes to do. That's how we've cut youth tobacco use in half - not 
by arresting adult cigarette smokers.

Some worry about safety on the roads if marijuana is legalized. But 
of the 17 states with provisions for medical marijuana, there has 
been no evidence of an increase in cases of driving under the 
influence (DUI) involving cannabis. But just to be sure, Initiative 
502 comes with very strict and specific DUI provisions.

Many say marijuana itself isn't so bad, but it's dangerous as a 
gateway to harder drugs such as heroin. We believe the only "gateway" 
thing about marijuana is its illegality. When it's illegal, you have 
to buy it from criminals on the street who have a vested interest in 
getting you hooked on something more addictive and profitable.

In 2011, a decade after Portugal decriminalized all drugs, a study 
found that marijuana use had not gone up. (In fact, cannabis use 
among Portuguese young adults is about half the European average). 
Meanwhile, Portugal's hard-drug-addicted population has been reduced 
by half. Most important, drug-related crime is down, saving lots of 
money and freeing up Portuguese law enforcement to focus on other priorities.

If Initiative 502 passes, won't the federal government simply 
override the will of the people of Washington state? No one knows for 
sure how the feds will react. But our country was designed for states 
to be the incubators of change. After all, it was individual states 
that defied the federal government and made possible the end of 
alcohol prohibition in the 1930s. Since the 1990s, 17 states have 
legalized medicinal marijuana in direct opposition to federal law. 
And, when strict parameters are set and followed, the feds have 
generally stayed out.

There are so many reasons to end the prohibition on marijuana. 
Whether you want to improve the well-being of children, redirect 
money away from criminals and into our state's coffers or protect 
civil liberties, it's clearly time for a new approach. Rather than 
being "hard on drugs" or "soft on drugs," we can finally be smart on 
drugs with Initiative 502. Please vote yes.
- ---
MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom