Pubdate: Thu, 08 Nov 2012 Source: National Post (Canada) Copyright: 2012 Canwest Publishing Inc. Contact: http://drugsense.org/url/wEtbT4yU Website: http://www.nationalpost.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/286 Author: Jesse Kline THE BEGINNING OF THE END OF THE WAR ON DRUGS Bleary-eyed conservatives awoke Wednesday to ponder again why a country in such dire financial straights would re-elect Barack Obama. But Tuesday's election was even worse for social conservatives, who had to confront numerous ballot initiatives approving same-sex marriage, and two states voting to legalize marijuana, not just for medical use, but for the enjoyment of anyone who wants to come home after a hard day's work and spark up the Demon Weed. Massachusetts joins a list of 17 states, plus the District of Columbia, that now allow the use of marijuana for medicinal purposes. Two states went even further: Colorado and Washington state both approved measures to legalize marijuana by a vote of 55%-45%. In both states, recreational pot smokers over the age of 21 will no longer face penalties for possessing less than one ounce of marijuana. Colorado's new law also allows people to grow up to six plants for personal use and transfer up to an ounce, so long as it's not sold at a profit - giving people there immediate access to legal weed. Regulations surrounding the commercial production and sale still have to be written. The Washington Liquor Control Board has until Dec. 1, 2013, to adopt new rules for growers and sellers, while Colorado's Department of Revenue will be required to come up with new regulations by July. It would appear that the groundswell of opposition to America's neverending war on drugs is starting to make inroads where the hippies of yesteryear failed so miserably. America boasts the world's largest prison population - 2.6 million people are incarcerated, compared to 1.6 million in China - many of whom are languishing in jail for committing non-violent drug offences. For years, politicians in the United States have imposed tougher sentences and stricter laws, out of fear the electorate would punish them if they appeared soft on crime. What happened on Tuesday represents a sea change: Voters signalled they have finally had enough of a drug policy that caused more harm than the substances from which it is supposed to protect people. And this change did not come from the courts, the political elite or an army of stoners, but from everyday people who have come to realize the follies of prohibition. Indeed, much like alcohol prohibition in the 1920s, U.S. drug policy enriches organized crime, feeds violence, prevents the state from tapping into a lucrative source of revenue and makes it illegal for responsible adults to make decisions about what to put in their own bodies. But undoing all the damage that has already been done will be a long and arduous process. Marijuana remains a Schedule I substance in the United States, which is prohibited under federal law. And before all the stoners out there get too excited about Obama - who passed around a few spliffs in his college days - it should be remembered that the Obama administration has carried out more raids on medical marijuana dispensaries than its Republican predecessor. That being said, the results of this historic election fundamentally changes the game. Obama still faces a divided Congress, but he controls the Justice Department and no longer has to worry about getting reelected. With so many states permitting the sale of medicinal marijuana, and two states opting for outright legalization, the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) - which relies on state and local police to make 99% of marijuana-related arrests - simply does not have the resources to shut down everyone who will be selling supplies. The Obama administration will come under increasing pressure to make the DEA stand down and allow the states to continue with their legalization experiments. This, of course, could easily change with a new president in 2016, but Obama may have a path for pushing a liberalization law through Congress. Many constitutional conservatives favour measures that put decision-making powers back in the hands of the states. Obama could work with Democrats and Republicans in Congress to pass some meaningful reforms that would allow the states to legally experiment with different approaches to drug policy. In the long run, the outcome of Tuesday's presidential election may not matter all that much. Neither candidate had a plan to balance the country's budget in a reasonable amount of time; neither Romney nor Obama would have been willing to stand aside and let the economy get back to work on its own; and both men would have continued on roughly the same path in terms of foreign policy. But historians may look back and see 2012 as the year when Nixon's war on drugs finally crested and began to roll back, leaving a more sensible and freer society in its place. - --- MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom