Pubdate: Sat, 02 Feb 2013 Source: National Post (Canada) Copyright: 2013 Canwest Publishing Inc. Contact: http://drugsense.org/url/wEtbT4yU Website: http://www.nationalpost.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/286 Author: Colin Perkel MARIJUANA LAWS UPHELD IN TOP COURT Benefits Not Proven, Some Physicians Say TORONTO * Canada's ban on marijuana was effectively upheld Friday when Ontario's top court struck down an earlier court decision that said Canada's laws related to medicinal pot were unconstitutional. The Court of Appeal ruled the trial judge had made numerous errors in striking down the country's medical pot laws. Among other things, the Appeal Court found the judge was wrong to interpret an earlier ruling as creating a constitutional right to use medical marijuana. "Given that marijuana can medically benefit some individuals, a blanket criminal prohibition on its use is unconstitutional," the Appeal Court said. "(However), this court did not hold that serious illness gives rise to an automatic right to use marijuana." Currently, doctors are allowed to exempt patients from the ban on marijuana, but many physicians have refused to prescribe the drug on the grounds its benefits are not scientifically proven. The Canadian HIV/AIDS Legal Network called the decision a disappointing missed opportunity. "People shouldn't have to risk going to prison in order to get the medicine they need," said Richard Elliott, executive director of the network. The ruling comes in the case of Matthew Mernagh, 37, of St. Catharines, Ont., who suffers from fibromyalgia, scoliosis, seizures and depression. While he argues marijuana is the most effective treatment of his pain, he said he was unable to find a doctor to support his application for a medical marijuana licence. Mr. Mernagh grew his own and was charged with producing the drug in April, 2008. In April 2011, Ontario Superior Court Justice Donald Taliano found that sick people cannot get access to medical marijuana through appropriate means. He said that forced ill people who should be able to get the drugs to resort to criminal acts. The Appeal Court found Mr. Taliano had relied on "anecdotal evidence" and drew unfounded conclusions that the medicinal pot scheme made it almost impossible for patients to get legal access to the drug. - --- MAP posted-by: Jo-D