Pubdate: Sun, 23 Jun 2013 Source: Worcester Telegram & Gazette (MA) Copyright: 2013 Worcester Telegram & Gazette Contact: http://www.telegram.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/509 Note: Rarely prints LTEs from outside circulation area - requires 'Letter to the Editor' in subject Author: Shaun Sutner DRUG LAB SCANDAL CAUSES OLD EVIDENCE TO PILE UP Disgraced former state chemist Annie Dookhan almost single-handedly brought the state's drug testing system to a standstill and cast doubt on tens of thousands of drug convictions. Now it turns out the indicted chemist has also triggered the shutdown of the wide-ranging system of destroying drug evidence that is no longer needed for criminal prosecution, causing a massive backlog of old drug evidence in barracks and police stations statewide. State public safety authorities last July ordered an indefinite moratorium on the destruction of drug evidence. That stoppage is still in effect and is likely to remain so at least until the state Inspector General completes a report on the state Department of Public Health's two former drug testing labs, which have since been taken over by the state police. Meanwhile, state police evidence experts are developing guidelines for use by all law enforcement agencies -- including the state police and local police departments across the state -- on best practices for getting rid of old drug evidence. While state law sets out a process for police to go through local district attorneys to obtain court orders to destroy drug evidence, it does not stipulate how long departments can hold items or how soon they have to dispose of material after a case is closed. But long before the scandal that was sparked by Annie Dookhan, the retention of drug evidence at the Southboro Police Department was a growing problem. A fired former officer accused the department of shoddy drug evidence procedures that apparently has resulted in more than 745 such items, dating as far back as 1992, being stockpiled at the department. "The protocols that are being established are still a work in progress," said state police spokesman David Procopio. Mr. Procopio said that when the state police inherited the DPH labs - -- where both testing and drug destruction was done -- "there were no clear guidelines on how it was to be done." With drugs piling up in barracks and police stations, Mr. Procopio said state police officials asked state Trial Court administrators this month if they could again begin incinerating old drugs but were told to hold off until the Inspector General's report. "We can understand the court's concern, but our concern is we're going to run out of storage space," Mr. Procopio said. Jack Myers, a spokesman for Inspector General Glenn A. Cunha said the IG's report will be done by the end of the year. The IG's investigation has been a time-consuming process requiring the scanning of some 2 million physical records from the former DPH labs in Boston and Amherst, Mr. Myers said. The Amherst lab has been temporarily closed, with drug testing transferred to University of Massachusetts Medical School in Worcester. Michael Ehrlich, a Worcester criminal defense lawyer, said the moratorium is probably a wise move, given the disarray in the drug analysis system and the lack of guidance in state law. "I think it's reasonable," Mr. Ehrlich said. "You can't keep drugs for infinity. "But it's also logical to have each individual DA's office make decisions on individual cases," he said. But Mr. Ehrlich added that in rare instances, old cases can be re-opened with new trials, years after evidence has been destroyed, so that is why judges weigh cases individually as well. Through a spokesman, Worcester District Attorney Joseph D. Early Jr. said he would reserve comment on what he thinks is the best course of action for destroying old drug evidence. "We are waiting for the state police guidelines to determine the best practices for destruction," Mr. Early said in an email through a spokesman. - --- MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom