Pubdate: Fri, 05 Jul 2013 Source: Kennebunk Post (ME) Contact: 2013 Mainely Media LLC Website: http://post.mainelymediallc.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/5454 Author: Al Diamon STONED AND STUPID You can almost see the IQ points evaporating. The stoners pushing a referendum to legalize the use of marijuana by adults in Maine's most populous city seem to be growing dopier by the toke - in both senses of dopier. Their campaign to turn Portland into Potland relies heavily on an ill-considered premise that's guaranteed to turn off potential supporters. Let me be clear - or at least as clear as the smokeladen air surrounding this issue allows. I think laws banning the possession and use of marijuana by those 21 or older are stupider and more outdated than Cheech and Chong routines. They've done nothing to stop anyone from using the weed. They waste scarce law-enforcement resources. They use up costly space imprisoning people who are no threat to society. And they don't stop teenagers from inhaling all they want. When a statute is that ineffective, it ought to be repealed. If I ever get a chance to vote to end the prohibition against ganja, I'll proudly mark my ballot in favor of freedom and common sense. That is, I will unless the pro-pot forces of the Washington, D.C.-based Marijuana Policy Project (MPP) keep promoting their noxious campaign against alcohol. I don't smoke dope. But I do drink. I support allowing everyone to make his or her own choices (and bear his or her own responsibility) when it comes to recreational drugs. There are advantages to all of them, as well as drawbacks and dangers. Pretending otherwise is every bit as brainless as believing you can do away with a commonly occurring substance simply by passing a law. If that were true, we'd have made cancer cells illegal. Unfortunately, there are those in the cannabis campaign who aren't quite as open-minded. The MPP has online ads that claim, "Alcohol is highly toxic, which is why it produces hangovers and long term damage to users." These are almost exactly the same misleading claims made by neo-prohibitionists in their efforts to restrict access to liquor. In reality, depending on levels of consumption, alcohol is no more toxic than butter, aspirin or the Christian Civic League. Excessive exposure to any of them is going to leave you talking to Ralph on the big porcelain telephone. David Boyer, the MPP's Maine political director, told the Portland Press Herald, "[M]arijuana is an objectively less harmful substance than [beer]." Objectively? The short-term side effects associated with a single moderately sized doobie include loss of memory, distorted perspective, problems with coordination and difficulty learning. In other words, about the same problems that crop up after slamming down a six pack. The long-term consequences of heavy use of loco weed are even scarier. The average reefer contains three times the amount of tar as a similarly sized tobacco cigarette. Those carcinogenic hydrocarbons not only increase your chances of getting you know what, but can also cause lung infections, obstructed airways and impairment to the immune system. The increased heart rate and lowered blood pressure experienced by those with THC is their systems is a recipe for heart attacks. I'll put that list up against the danger of cirrhosis of the liver caused by chronic alcoholism any day. In a news release, Boyer claims alcohol "contribute[s] to violence and injuries." No dispute there, except to note that there has been little research into the role of the kind herb in traffic accidents. Several studies indicate that because the effects of dope vary widely in individuals, it's difficult to assess impairment. Statewide, in 2012, about 10 percent of people seeking help for drug dependency said their primary problem was marijuana. While that's less than those trying to deal with drinking, it's still significant. And booze-related problems have declined since 2009 by 38 percent. Those reporting troubles with wacky tabacky declined less than 6 percent over the same period and increased 17 percent between 2011 and 2012, according to the report "Substance Abuse Trends in Maine." One reason the pro-potsters are attacking alcohol is because of a history of alcohol attacking them. Big Booze contributed heavily to anti-hemp campaigns in California in recent years. But so did the tobacco industry. And law enforcement political action committees. And the owners of medical marijuana clinics, who'd be put out of business if patients didn't need prescriptions to get their drugs. Oddly enough, legalization proponents also claim - almost entirely without evidence - that major distillers, brewers and cigarette companies are poised to seize the dope market once laws are changed. Which doesn't explain why they're fighting to maintain the status quo. Contradictions, distortions, falsehoods and phony moralism seem to be the hallmarks of the campaign to legalize marijuana. With a platform like that, you might mistake it for a candidate for governor. Except it's even stupider. - --- MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom