Pubdate: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 Source: Virgin Islands Daily News, The (VI) Copyright: 2013 Virgin Islands Daily News Contact: http://www.virginislandsdailynews.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/3486 Author: Levelle T. Henry LEGALIZING MARIJUANA MAKES MORE SENSE FINANCIALLY THAN LEGALIZING PROSTITUTION Is our Legislature really considering legalizing prostitution? There are many reasons against sanctioning prostitution, on moral principles. The usual complaints: degradation to women and degeneration of societal standards, etc. There is also a detrimental economic aspect to legal prostitution in our smalltown community. Unless we start "bunny ranches" like the state of Nevada and invite nonVirgin Islanders to partake of prostitution services, legalized prostitution will not enhance our economy. Prostitution in a community our size will remove money from our residents' pocketbooks-like gambling. The money individuals spend on gambling and prostitution are better spent on self-improvement or family obligations. That is not to say people are not entitled to their own ideas of "fun." However, our community must always think about the financial benefits of legal enterprises. Legalized prostitution would increase Income Tax and Gross Receipts Tax revenues, but it would not improve the quality of the community or improve the economy. If the community is to consider controversial issues to increase tax revenue, let's consider industrial hemp and decriminalizing or legalizing marijuana as an export product to countries that have already decriminalized or legalized the plants' use. I believe the villainy of marijuana is diminishing throughout the world with the increase of research comparing the beneficial and adverse effects of the herb use to the effects of cigarette and alcohol. Marijuana has various medicinal benefits along with producing what we call a "high." Eighteen of the United States and the District of Columbia have decriminalized marijuana for medical or recreational use. The reason hemp needs legalization in the United States is unclear to me, except to deny the use of marijuana. That is something to be researched. I know of three European countries that have decriminalized the sale and use of marijuana: Belgium, Germany and The Netherlands, Amsterdam in particular. As usual, the U.S. Virgin Islands may be ignoring a way to enhance our financial economy. Naysayers act as if alcohol or cigarettes are greatly different from marijuana. They seem to forget that decriminalization or legalization does not allow free reign of the product sales or a "free for all" for users. Comprehensive legislation and registration and inspection of growers raising marijuana plants would greatly diminish contraband and black market activity, which responsible adult citizens would acknowledge exists regardless of the laws-even with cigarette and alcohol. This is the reason for the use of the words comprehensive laws. Even decriminalized or legalized home growth and use could be advocated- but they, too, would have to be registered and inspected quarterly or biannually- again to diminish black market activity. Absolutely no one registered for growing marijuana for personal use could sell the product for profit to anyone. This would defeat the economic purpose of the product. Although I don't understand how we are enacting the use of the industrial hemp legislation, I see it as a step toward enhancing our economy. In the U. S., the legal value of hemp was not considered until the 1930s. Prior to that time it was used openly: industrially, medically and recreationally. Hemp has been villainized because of the threat to other economies' profitability, namely clothing, medicine, paper & fibrous products as well as some I am probably am unaware of. In various forms, one crop - hemp, infringes on the cotton, silk and synthetic clothing material industries, the medicinal sedatives that are synthetically created by pharmaceutical companies and the paper and fiber companies that use trees and oil-based synthetics to create paper, rope, packaging products and more. Hopefully, we have a contingency searching for a variety of hemp-producing businesses so we will have businesses producing bolts of cloth, paper products or lubricants in the next five years. Consequently, we would be seeing fields of hemp rather than nonproductive "tan tan." We might consider using sections of the abandoned HOVENSA refinery as an industrial business area. This is not about whether a person agrees with the use of industrial hemp or decriminalized/legalized marijuana-grade hemp (Cannabis sativa and Cannabis indicia). Hemp varieties (primarily in the sativa family) are an innocuous bush that at worst creates a product less harmful than alcohol, addictive pills and definitely, cigarettes. At best it simplifies the complexity and difficulty of harvesting the base product for paper and packaging products, but most important it improves the condition of the world's forests and jungles- consequently, the quality of the air we breathe. It also acts as a nonsynthetic sedative, treatment for glaucoma and other medicinal uses. Imagine what the world's forests would look like if we harvested a fastgrowing, tall, fibrous bush for these products rather than trees. Trees might end up being used mainly for telephone poles and raw lumber - decreasing the rash impact it currently has on our environment. Only trees with consumptive or medicinal properties not found in bushes would have to cut or, preferably, pruned. What can the Virgin Islands do with harvested hemp and the production of marijuana? Many things, but the simplest to organize, in my opinion, is the growth of raw hemp for wholesale to a variety of production companies locally and internationally that would export hemp products. Also the wholesale of organic, recreational marijuana-the most controversial aspect of hemp production - to states or countries that have decriminalized or legalized it would be economically profitable. I believe that certain community members overlook the fact that there are many aspects to the decriminalization or legalization of hemp and marijuana. There are many options. The simplest would be to leave it illegal and only legalize growth for exportation as described earlier: to have "grow houses" that would act as wholesalers to countries such as The Netherlands, Canada or Germany as well as to various United States - assuming that it would be less expensive to grow it in our warm climate than in cold climates. Also, it would create legal jobs for the people in the territory who already grow marijuana and would teach them business skills. I think that people living in the areas where marijuana is legalized would consider expanding their businesses to warmer climates as well. The workforce for this industry should come solely from areas where hemp and marijuana are decriminalized or legalized - to relieve the overload of the workforce for that industry. This would make a significant contribution to our tax revenue. As with rum revenues, the federal government might consider decreasing grants by allowing us to export marijuana. Decriminalization or legalization on the local level will have to be determined by the Virgin Islands community. There are various ways to do this with discussion in the community. I am always amazed at the viewpoint of naysayers to many good economic enhancing suggestions, particularly, with marijuana and development. People act like it would be a free for all with marijuana being sold "willy-nilly" and smoked as individuals wished. That would be far from the truth. Any legislation includes comprehensive rules. If marijuana was decriminalized or legalized for use within the territory, it would be up to the community to decide how we want the legalization to manifest itself, for example in cafes- as in Amsterdam, which do not serve alcohol but do serve light fare - or in various open air areas on each island. Levelle T. Henry, St. Croix - --- MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom