Pubdate: Mon, 05 Aug 2013 Source: Record, The (Stockton, CA) Copyright: 2013 The Record Contact: http://www.recordnet.com/apps/pbcs.dll/section?Category=A_OPINION05 Website: http://www.recordnet.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/428 DISPENSE WITH DISPENSARIES Last Thing City Needs Is Adding Medical Pot to List of Pressing Issues The Stockton City Council's decision to ban medical marijuana dispensaries is proper given the yet-to-be-resolved conflict between state and federal pot laws, the city's energy-sapping bankruptcy, and the still-thin police ranks. The city doesn't need another big issue on its table. To some, of course, this is a step backward. Councilwoman Dyane Burgos said as much in casting one of two votes against the ban. As she noted, 21 states allow medical marijuana - including California - and two allow its recreational use. But the conflict between federal law, which considers marijuana a Schedule 1 narcotic, and state law remains. Federal law enforcement has been spotty, to be sure, but the potential is always there. Dealing with such a conflict could divert city staff time needed for more important issues, such as the on-going bankruptcy process. Further, Stockton doesn't have enough police officers to deal with the crime it has today. Some calls for service go unanswered or are delayed because there are not enough officers on duty. The experience in other cities is that crime tends to concentrate around marijuana dispensaries. If that happened here, it would add more pressure on police efforts. The council's action last week reverses a 2010 ordinance allowing medical marijuana dispensaries. Two outlets will be grandfathered in under that ordinance. Two others are said to be operating without the benefit of the required city permits, itself an indication of the sometimes dicey nature of the marijuana dispensary business. There could come a time when the city again reverses direction on this issue, as Councilwoman Kathy Miller said. That time is not now. Stockton has a lot of local issues to get past first. As a nation we have to decide whether pot is for fun or for treatment. Our suspicion is that much that passes as medicinal use in reality is recreational use. If we decide it's only for medicinal use, then it should be prescribed and dispensed in medical settings, not from warehouses or strip mall shops when someone presents a prescription obtained after an Internet interview by a faraway doctor. If we decide it's for recreational use, then it should be available with at least as much control as we apply to cigarettes and alcohol. Settling these issues extends well beyond Stockton's city limits. - --- MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom