Pubdate: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 Source: Inland Valley Daily Bulletin (Ontario, CA) Copyright: 2013 Los Angeles Newspaper Group Contact: http://www.dailybulletin.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/871 Author: Wes Woods Bookmark: http://mapinc.org/people/Swerdlow JURORS FIND IN FAVOR OF MARIJUANA ACTIVIST SWERDLOW IN CHABOT CIVIL TRIAL RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A jury ruled in favor of Inland Empire marijuana activist Lanny Swerdlow on Wednesday in his civil trial against anti-drug foe Paul Chabot with a final financial amount pending based on punitive damages. Jurors will be back in West Valley Superior Court at 1:30 p.m. today to determine punitive damages against Chabot, said Judge Joseph Brisco to Swerdlow, who is representing himself, and Chabot's attorney Andrew Haynal in court before court was dismissed. Swerdlow is seeking punitive damages of $1 million after a 2007 incident at a Rancho Cucamonga meeting where he alleged false arrest and malicious prosecution. The jury on Wednesday found for the false arrest but not for the malicious prosecution and ruled for $5,000 for past economic and non-economic losses. Jurors will meet again to determine punitive damages. Chabot had filed a counter-suit claiming Swerdlow battered him, which the activist denied, and asked for attorney fees but the jury denied his request. Brisco said that Swerdlow today will be able to question Chabot about his finances and the jury can "punish" Chabot or not based on the testimony. "I'm feeling absolutely vindicated," Swerdlow said after the verdict. "It was a horrible experience to go through. To be put under trial for something I didn't do. So it's wonderful. The courts decided that I didn't do it. And here again even based on the preponderance of evidence and a lower standard, the jury said I did not push Paul Chabot." After the ruling, Haynal and Chabot declined to comment until the jury determined the damages amount. In 2008, Swerdlow was found not guilty after being accused of battery against Chabot at an Inland Valley Drug Free Coalition meeting in Rancho Cucamonga a year earlier. Swerdlow went to the meeting in Rancho Cucamonga, saying he wanted to listen before passing out fliers in support of medical marijuana but later was arrested for allegedly assaulting Chabot, who denied him entry to the public event. Haynal briefly asked the jury questions afterward including if they believed that Swerdlow attacked Chabot with an intent to harm, and each member voted no. One woman juror of the 12-person jury answered "no" when asked if Chabot's conduct was a substantial factor in causing harm to Swerdlow but the others said they voted yes. - --- MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom