Pubdate: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 Source: Standard-Times (New Bedford, MA) Copyright: 2013 South Coast Media Group Contact: http://www.southcoasttoday.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/422 Author: Jon Mitchell Note: Jon Mitchell is mayor of New Bedford. STRIKING THE RIGHT BALANCE ON MEDICAL MARIJUANA My job as mayor is to put the overall interest of the city first, and propose solutions that balance competing interests as best as possible. My approach to the issue of locating medical marijuana facilities in the city is a good example. The legal use of marijuana for medical purposes is new to Massachusetts, having been approved by voters last year. Marijuana production and dispensing facilities are now being proposed for sites across New Bedford. Facing this uncharted territory, my administration has attempted to understand the state's new medical marijuana regulations, how marijuana facilities operate and the effect the facilities could have on our city. After several months of meetings with marijuana developers, a personal tour of an existing facility in Rhode Island, and a careful evaluation of the costs and benefits, I sent a letter last week to the Massachusetts Department of Public Health that outlines the licensing approach I believe would work best for New Bedford. In this case, putting the overall interest of the City first means proposing some general parameters that balance the competing interests of neighborhoods, residents looking for jobs and those who want access to marijuana to treat health conditions. It's not about being for or against medical marijuana; it is one thing to support legalization for all of Massachusetts, but the question of whose neighborhood the facility should go in is quite another matter. Nor is it about supporting or opposing any particular proposal. Rather, it's about setting fair, reasonable boundaries that are appropriate for densely populated urban areas. In my letter to the state, I held open the possibility of support for a developer whose proposal would (1) restrict itself to a secure production facility in the New Bedford Business Park, an exclusively industrial area, (2) locate its related dispensary in a retail area outside the city with public transportation access, and (3) provide a mitigation agreement to offset the facility's community impact. These parameters are based on a careful assessment of the tradeoffs with production facilities and dispensaries. One of the most pressing law enforcement problems our city faces is the black market for prescription drugs. Our Police Department believes the diversion of painkillers and other prescription drugs is a growing problem that directly threatens the safety and well-being of the community, and that marijuana dispensaries might introduce yet another drug diversion problem. I am especially troubled by the possibility that under the regulations, a patient may be prescribed up to 10 ounces of marijuana in a 60-day period. That is a sizeable amount of marijuana, which would have a street value of approximately $1,200. The incentive for some patients to re-sell their prescriptions would be real and powerful, and would pose a problem regardless of the dispensary's location in the city. Locating facilities in dense urban neighborhoods also would be fraught with risk. The Police Department has noted that because marijuana facilities in such places would be more difficult to secure, facility employees may be more likely to be extorted. Moreover, the prospect of a major marijuana facility setting up in close proximity to schools, playgrounds and churches is unsettling to many residents. One parent posed the question to me bluntly, "Would you want to raise your child across the street from a marijuana factory?" New Bedford's reputation is ascending, and we are working hard to enhance the city's image. New Bedford's improving brand helps to spur private investment and create more jobs. The marketing associated with dispensaries, however, might undermine all that positive momentum. Advertising that directly connects New Bedford with marijuana distribution will inevitably reinforce the negative stereotypes of the City that we are striving to undo. These costs would not be offset by the direct economic benefits. Dispensaries are in effect small retail businesses. They generate few jobs. The dispensary we visited in Rhode Island, for instance, had only four full-time employees. Moreover, in my view, the establishment of a dispensary within the city's borders cannot be justified by the need for accessible health care. For New Bedford residents who believe that their medical conditions can be effectively treated only by marijuana, there are numerous retail locations in the surrounding communities that are readily accessible by car or public transportation. The case for production centers, if located properly, tilts slightly in the other direction. By credible estimates, the production centers would yield 50 or so full-time, though low-paying, jobs. The key is to mitigate the threat to neighborhood quality of life by limiting such facilities to isolated, non-residential areas, like the Business Park. At the end of the day, New Bedford residents deserve from their government transparent decision-making based on the facts. Whether it's medical marijuana facilities or some other matter, it's the approach that residents can count on from me, now and in the future. - --- MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom