Pubdate: Sat, 14 Dec 2013 Source: Dallas Morning News (TX) Copyright: 2013 The New York Times Contact: http://www.dallasnews.com/opinion/send-a-letter/ Website: http://www.dallasnews.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/117 Authors: Jack Healy and Kirk Johnson, The New York Times STATES' SHIFT TO LEGAL POT NEARS Economic High Touted, but Some Worry About Harmful Side Effects DENVER - Starting early next year, any adult with a craving or curiosity will be able to stroll into a strip mall or downtown shop in Colorado or Washington state and do what has long been forbidden: buy a bag of legal marijuana. After landmark votes made marijuana legal for recreational consumption, users in those two states will no longer need doctors' notes or medical reasons to buy the drug. Instead, they will simply show identification to prove that they are at least 21, and with the cautious blessing of state and federal officials, they will be able to buy as much as an ounce of marijuana and smoke it in their living rooms. It is a new frontier of drug legalization, one that marks a stark turn away from the eras of Reefer Madness, zero tolerance and Just Say No warnings about the dangers of marijuana. But it also raises questions about whether these pioneering states will be able to regulate and contain a drug that is outlawed across most of the country - although medical marijuana can be sold legally in 20 states and the District of Columbia. The end of the prohibition of alcohol in the 1930s, by contrast, to which some historians and legal scholars are comparing this moment, came all at once across the nation, not piecemeal. Supporters predict an economic boom in new business activity and cannabis tourism and reduced public expense with fewer low-level drug offenders clogging jails and courtrooms. Elected officials, parents' groups and police chiefs worry that drug traffickers will exploit the new markets, that more teenagers will take up marijuana and that two places with reputations for fresh air and clean living will become known as America's stoner states. Other states watching Other states flirting with legalization are watching closely, too, not least for the expected windfall in state revenue in stiffly taxing something that has never been taxed at all. Referendum drives modeled on Colorado and Washington are already underway for next year in Arizona, California, Oregon and Alaska, and others are expected to follow in 2016. So the pressures to get it right the first time, local and state officials said, are immense. "We are floating in uncharted waters here," said Mayor Michael Hancock of Denver, where 149 businesses have applied to sell or grow retail marijuana. Consider, for example, the strangely altered new role of the police, who in Washington are required to make sure all marijuana is of the legal, state-licensed variety. That could make for more crackdowns on illegal grow-and-sale operations, not fewer. That fact was highlighted when federal agents raided several dispensaries in Colorado last month, smashing glass and hauling away hundreds of plants. Legal but regulated Practical questions about the legal, workaday drug trade have required reams of rules and regulations to answer: Should it be specifically taxed? Voters said yes, and in Washington even specified where the tax money should be spent, with apportionments including the funding of academic research about marijuana. Can people give it away in public parks? No. Where can retailers set up shop, and how can they advertise? Nowhere near schools, and not to children. In Washington, even the size of a retailer's storefront name is regulated: 1,600 square inches. But most important, Colorado and Washington must show skeptical federal authorities that they can control this new world of regulated marijuana and keep it from flowing to underage consumers, into other states or into the grip of drug traffickers and violent cartels. Even as the Justice Department announced in August that it would not block states from regulating marijuana, it warned that their enforcement rules "must be tough in practice, not just on paper." - --- MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom