Pubdate: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 Source: Cochrane Eagle (CN AB) Copyright: 2014 Cochrane Eagle Contact: http://www.cochraneeagle.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/3992 Author: Kristen Spruit Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/mjcn.htm (Cannabis - Canada) Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/mmj.htm (Cannabis - Medicinal) RESIDENTS SHARE VIEWS ON LICENSED MEDICAL MARIJUANA FACILITIES IN ROCKY VIEW COUNTY Rocky View County residents shared their feelings on a proposed land use amendment that would permit Licensed Medical Marijuana Facilities. Rocky View County (RVC) is proposing a change to its Land Use Bylaw (LUB) to only allow federally-regulated Licensed Medical Marijuana Facilities to be located in areas of the county that are zoned for commercial use. An open house was held at the county office March 5 from 4:30 p.m. to 7:30 p.m. to inform residents about the proposed amendments, in advance of the public hearing March 25 when council will vote whether to approve the amendments. The proposed changes follow Health Canada's announcement in June 2013 that the Marijuana Medical Access Program - which allowed licensed individuals to produce marijuana at home for medical uses - would be phased-out by March 31, 2014, and replaced by licensed production facilities. Under the current LUB, the production of medical marijuana is acceptable on lands that are designated for horticulture use. Among RVC's eight proposed amendments is to make a noted difference between the definition of a home-based business, horticulture development and market garden, and to define a Medical Marijuana Production Facility. More than 70 people attended the open house, including residents voicing concerns about the safety of future grow-up locations, as well as residents who intend to apply to become a licensed producer. Shawn Ripley, a Madden-area resident, said he doesn't think the amendments are necessary. "I understand why you might have an intent to move the facilities into an industrial area, but I think the unintended consequences in this situation is that you're actually moving it closer to high-density residential areas, whereas if you are to leave it in the agricultural zone, it makes much more sense," said Ripley. He added that he would not be opposed to a facility located in the Madden area if it met all the federal requirements. Airdrie resident Shawn, who asked his last-name not be published for security reasons, said he intends to apply to become a licensed producer with several of his partners. He said he agreed with the amendments the county is proposing. "A lot of the areas the county is proposing (as an acceptable location) are fine. I like the idea that it's outside of towns and not near residential areas or schools. Even though if it's (licensed marijuana facilities) done properly it's perfectly safe, it's still better to keep it away," he said. Shawn, the owner of a landscaping company, said he intends to get into the industry because it "makes good business-sense," whereas his partners have more personal reasons. "One of my partners' wives uses medical marijuana and she has many friends that do as well, and they're having a lot of troubles accessing the system. We're hoping these are the kinds of people we're going to help out if we get approved," he said. Although Shawn said a location has not been determined for their proposed business, they are interested in areas in Balzac and Crossfield. He said the partners have been working on developing a business plan, and intend for their operation to be mid-size at first, servicing between 400 and 500 customers a year, and growing from there. "More and more people are going to need these kinds of suppliers because they're going to have no other choice. Either they're going to have to buy it illegally on the street or grow it illegally themselves or they buy it from a supplier, and if they can get good suppliers - which is what we're hoping to be - and get a good product for a very reasonable price with good service and it's organic, then that helps them out," said Shawn. He said he plans to attend the county's public hearing March 25, which takes place at 1:30 p.m. at the municipal office. Residents are able to voice their opinions, support or concerns about the amendments at the hearing, or in writing before March 12. According to the information boards on display at the open house, the county has about 24 industrial or business areas where future marijuana operations could be located, but landowners could also apply to council to have their land redesignated to allow a facility. Operations must be a minimum of 400 metres away from a school site or residential area. To see the proposed amendments, visit www.rockyview.ca . - --- MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom