Pubdate: Sun, 16 Mar 2014 Source: Chicago Tribune (IL) Copyright: 2014 Chicago Tribune Company Contact: http://drugsense.org/url/IuiAC7IZ Website: http://www.chicagotribune.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/82 Authors: Evan Halper and Cindy Carcamo Halper, Tribune Newspapers MARIJUANA STUDY GETS GREEN LIGHT Arizona Researcher Would Examine Use in PTSD Treatment WASHINGTON - The Obama administration has handed backers of medical marijuana a significant victory, opening the way for a University of Arizona researcher to examine whether pot can help veterans cope with post-traumatic stress, a move that could lead to broader studies into potential benefits of the drug. For years, scientists who have wanted to study how marijuana might be used to treat illness say they have been stymied by resistance from federal drug officials. The Arizona study had long ago been sanctioned by the Food and Drug Administration, but under federal rules, such experiments can use marijuana only from a single, government-run farm in Mississippi. Researchers say the agency that oversees the farm, the National Institute on Drug Abuse, has long been hostile to proposals aimed at examining possible benefits of the drug. "This is a great day," said the Arizona researcher, Suzanne Sisley, clinical assistant professor of psychology at the university's medical school, who has been trying to get the green light for her study for three years. "The merits of a rigorous scientific trial have finally trumped politics. "We never relented," Sisley said. "But most other scientists have chosen not to even apply. The process is so onerous. With the implementation of this study and the data generated, this could lead to other crucial research projects." Backers of medical marijuana hailed the news Friday as an indication that the government had started coming to terms with one of the more striking paradoxes of federal drug policy: Even as state laws are allowing about 1 million Americans to legally use marijuana to treat ailments, scientists have had difficulty getting approval to study how the drug might be employed more effectively. "The political dynamics are shifting," said Rick Doblin, executive director of the Multidisciplinary Association for Psychedelic Studies, a group based in Santa Cruz that is raising money to help fund studies such as Sisley's. The group counts several prominent philanthropists among its backers, including two Pritzkers and a Rockefeller. Government officials said the approval did not represent a change in underlying policy - just a recognition Sisley's proposal meets official standards for research using illegal drugs. The research still requires approval of one more agency, the Drug Enforcement Administration, but Sisley and Doblin expressed confidence that would prove a lesser hurdle. In its letter approving the application, a government review panel noted what it called "significant changes" in the study that justified approving it. Doblin said the changes did not affect the "core design" of the study. Federal restrictions on pot research have been a source of tension for years. Researchers, marijuana advocates and some members of Congress have accused the National Institute on Drug Abuse of hoarding the nation's only sanctioned research pot for studies aimed at highlighting the drug's ill effects. They had pointed to Sisley's experience as a prime example of what they called an irrational and disjointed federal policy. "You have impossible burdens," said Rep. Earl Blumenauer, D-Ore., who has enlisted other members of Congress to lobby the administration to give researchers more access to the drug. "These are not people who are going to be involved with some clandestine production of the drug or do something nefarious." Scientists say more research could help determine more precisely which ailments the drug can treat and could eventually lead to regulation by the FDA as a prescription drug. That would allow patients to know what they are consuming. Medical marijuana users often have little information about the potency and purity of the pot they buy. Physicians who prescribe the drug do so on the basis of anecdotal evidence. At the core of the debate is an issue that has implications for research and the movement to legalize marijuana for recreational use, as Colorado and Washington have done. Federal law classifies pot as more dangerous than cocaine and methamphetamine. As a Schedule 1 drug, marijuana is designated as having "no currently accepted medical use and a high potential for abuse," as well as being a drug that puts users at risk of "severe psychological or physical dependence." Researchers say that classification needs to change for science to proceed uninhibited. Making the change, though, would be called a retreat in the war on drugs by some. The Obama administration could reschedule the drug without congressional action but has shown no inclination to wade into that fight. - --- MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom