Pubdate: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 Source: Colusa County Sun-Herald (CA) Copyright: 2014 Freedom Communications Contact: http://www.colusa-sun-herald.com/sections/letters-to-editor/ Website: http://www.colusa-sun-herald.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/4994 Author: Brian Pearson CITY TO BAN POT GROWTH Council Requests Ordinance Draft Before Next Meeting; Mayor Says Public Welcome to Comment on It The Colusa City Council voted 4-1 on March 18 to pursue an outright ban for the cultivation of medical marijuana within the city limits - both indoor and outdoor. The lone "nay" was cast by Councilwoman Marilyn Acree. City attorney Kristen Hicks was directed by the council to draft a total-ban ordinance to be reviewed and discussed at a later meeting - making Colusa the fourth city to do so since Maral v. City of Live Oak was decided by the 3rd District Court of Appeals. In that case, the Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's finding that there is no "unfettered right to cultivate medical marijuana." The ruling confirmed the city could legally ban the cultivation of medical marijuana without conflicting with the state's medical marijuana laws - Proposition 215 and California Senate Bill 420. While that legal battle was won by Live Oak, the appellants will now turn to the Supreme Court in hopes that it will overturn the decision. The plaintiffs in Maral - joined by the ACLU of Northern California in January - are asking the Supreme Court to grant review in the case and hold that bans on the cultivation of medical marijuana do conflict with the state's medical marijuana laws. If that fails to happen, the ACLU Northern California's website asks the Supreme Court to "depublish the erroneous Court of Appeal opinion so that it does not prompt other localities to enact similar bans, as some have already begun to do." Other cities considering an outright ban of medical marijuana cultivation are Fresno, Avenal and Beaumont. Fresno County is also considering an outright ban. "Sure, (the Maral decision) simplified things. That made it so it was not a mystery for us and less of a risk for litigation - that's definitely a contributing factor," said Vice-Mayor Kirk Kelleher, adding this is a decision the majority of the community seems to support. "From my perspective, there has been no opposition from the public and the people I have spoken with. It just creates a bad-neighbor situation - from the smell, the security, and just all the obvious avenues - so we're just going to ban it and see where it goes," said Kelleher. As for those who benefit from the legitimate use of medical marijuana, "it's just like any other medicinal product. You're going to have to go where they sell it," Kelleher said. According to Mayor Greg Ponciano, the decision for an outright ban came in part from a lack of resources to enforce regulations. "For simplicity's sake, we decided to go with the outright ban. We don't have the resources to regulate it. The more we talked about it, the more we realized outright ban would be safest, cleanest and best for the citizens," Ponciano said. Ponciano said the city approached it solely from a public nuisance and a public safety standpoint. "We weren't discussing the legitimacy of medical marijuana. That was mentioned a couple of times at the meeting," said Ponciano. "I don't know what the ordinance will entail when it comes back to us. As far as I know, it will be patterned after what Live Oak did. It's going to be a code violation, not a criminal violation." Ponciano said the city needs to move forward with the ban and not be afraid of possible litigation. "We can't allow ourselves to be governed by fear of getting sued. Anybody can sue anybody for anything," Ponciano said, "I would feel horrible if something happened, like a kid jumping over a fence into a marijuana garden and getting mauled (by a guard dog), and we would have to go to the parents and say, 'I'm sorry, but we were afraid of getting sued.'" Even as Hicks prepares an ordinance for the outright ban of medical marijuana cultivation in the city limits, Ponciano is requesting the public to offer input - and said there would be another opportunity for community members to do so when the ordinance comes back before the council. - --- MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom