Pubdate: Sun, 13 Apr 2014 Source: Asbury Park Press (NJ) Section: 2014 Asbury Park Press Contact: http://www.app.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/26 Author: Kevin Sabet Note: Kevin A. Sabet is director and co-founder, with former Congressman Patrick J. Kennedy, of Project SAM (Smart Approaches to Marijuana). Note: OPED 2 of 3 TO LEGALIZE POT...OR NOT [Asbury Park Press Editor] A bill to legalize marijuana in New Jersey has been introduced by Democratic lawmakers in both the Senate and the Assembly, even though Gov. Chris Christie has indicated he would veto it. The sponsors argue that taxing marijuana would help raise badly needed revenue. Christie says legalization would "send the wrong message" at a time when the state is faced with a heroin epidemic and widespread abuses of prescription drugs.A Monmouth University/Asbury Park Press Poll released last week showed a nearly even split among those who favored and those who opposed legalization of marijuana. Below are essays presenting the cases for and against legalization. SOCIETAL COSTS NOT WORTH THE REVENUE Gov. Chris Christie was right to once again express his disdain for proposals that would legalize the use and sale of marijuana. His position is in line with that of the American Medical Association, American Society of Addiction Medicine, National School Nurses Association and other prominent groups and individuals. Legalization is a simplistic solution to an incredibly complex program. Indeed, legal marijuana is poised to become the Big Tobacco of our time, ushering in a massive, profit-hungry industry, promoting addiction by commercializing and marketing the drug to our most vulnerable. In Colorado, which began retail marijuana sales on Jan. 1, Big Marijuana has already begun to emerge. Pot purveyors are selling candies, Ring Pots, cookies and brownies. They are creating networks for investors and entrepreneurs in the marijuana industry, holding special "Shark Tank" fundraising sessions. A former Microsoft executive recently announced enthusiastically that he intends to create the "Starbucks of marijuana," ultimately "mint(ing) more millionaires than Microsoft." Another investor promises to become "the Philip Morris of marijuana." And now these various venture capitalists have come together to hire a Washington lobbyist to advocate for marijuana businesses in our nation's capital. The Big Marijuana playbook takes its cue from Big Tobacco: hire doctors to promote cigarettes as medicine, downplay its negative effects, infiltrate political leadership and target kids - since they will be your lifelong customers. Why should the establishment of another for-profit industry like alcohol and tobacco, which relies on addiction and heavy use, be cause for concern? First, legalizing marijuana would completely normalize use, especially among kids. And this is something we should care about. The marijuana our kids use today is five to six times stronger than what it was in the 1960s and '70s (resulting in addiction for one in every six 16-year-olds who ever try it). New methods of ingestion such as butane hash oil vaporization (or dabbing) are responsible for a growing number of hospital visits and overdoses. Though it is true that a majority of those who use marijuana will not become addicted, a significant number of users will suffer a great deal of harm in the form of IQ reduction, mental illness, poor learning outcomes, lung damage, car crashes, addiction, and emergency room admissions related to acute panic attacks and psychotic episodes. Is this the kind of New Jersey we want? Second, because criminal gangs make the vast majority of their revenue from drugs like cocaine and heroin, and since legalization proposals would still prohibit kids from buying marijuana legally, we can expect an underground market to continue to thrive. History suggests that the societal costs that accompany increased marijuana use will significantly outweigh any gains in tax revenue. Our experience with alcohol and tobacco shows that for every one dollar gained in taxes, 10 dollars are lost in social costs. In Colorado, tax revenue from the first month of legal sales barely reached $2 million, falling well short of previous projections. To maintain that marijuana should not be legalized, however, is not to say that low-level users should be arrested and/or incarcerated and saddled with criminal records that will stigmatize them for life. Though lower than the number of alcohol-related arrests for non-violent crimes (2.7 million), hundreds of thousands of marijuana-related arrests yearly is still something we must address. Pre- and post-arrest diversion programs, which exist in New Jersey now, need to be scaled up. But we need not legalize marijuana in order to tweak our sentencing and arrest practices. New Jersey is far too smart for simplistic solutions that fit on a bumper sticker. Neither "lock 'em up or legalize" is an intelligent way to address such a complex issue. Let's focus on strategies that work - drug prevention, justice reform, drug treatment courts and smart policing practices - and implement smart approaches to marijuana. Kevin A. Sabet is director and co-founder, with former Congressman Patrick J. Kennedy, of Project SAM (Smart Approaches to Marijuana). - --- MAP posted-by: Jo-D