Pubdate: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 Source: Plain Dealer, The (Cleveland, OH) Copyright: 2014 The Plain Dealer Contact: http://www.cleveland.com/plaindealer/letter-to-editor/ Website: http://www.cleveland.com/plaindealer/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/342 Note: priority given to local letter writers Author: Angela Townsend Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/testing.htm (Drug Testing) SCHOOL-WIDE DRUG TESTING: READERS WEIGH IN WITH PRAISE, CRITICISM CLEVELAND, Ohio -- It didn't take long after a Plain Dealer story about drug testing coming to three area high schools this fall posted Tuesday before cleveland.com readers began sharing their opinions. Many questioned the motives of the schools -- Gilmour Academy in Gates Mills, St. Edward High School in Lakewood, and St. Ignatius High School on Cleveland's West Side -- and whether or not students' privacy was at stake. Others who applauded the move wrote that school-wide drug testing is a necessary measure to keep children safe, to deter them from trying drugs and to and provide much-needed help to those who have already gone down that path. Here is a small sample from reader comments: From era9094: There is a heroin and opiate epidemic in our country. It starts innocently enough with experimentation with prescription pills, and moves quickly to heroin. Our young people are at great risk, across all socioeconomic classes. I applaud the schools who are recognizing this and taking action. If it can deter even a small number of kids from using/experimenting in the first place, then it is worth the controversy. I do agree that the administration and faculty should also be subject to this testing, and I would hope that this was already a condition of employment. From Jackhammer John: High-achieving students are essential for these schools to maintain their reputations. I'd think you'd want to avoid alienating them by treating them as crime suspects. From Kent Millstead: Sounds like a lot of expense to get at a small percentage of drug use. Paying to prove you're clean is a sad state of affair in today's world. From Stags_Leap: If they actually want to make hair testing valulable to the students, they should not only be testing for drugs, but heavy metal toxicity and current vitamin levels. From eoak: This will be interesting to observe. For such a public announcement I wonder how forthcoming the Catholic schools will be regarding the annual results. Motivation? I also wonder if there is something "brewing" within the ranks of these schools that has the administrators concerned beyond simple "wellness" lessons. Lots of these kids have money and resources for many types of drugs especially they pricey ones. From imwatchingyouctown: I am no fan of drug testing unless there is reason. But, these are private schools and they have every right. I would not be in favor of this in public schools. I think that drug testing is a violation of one's right to privacy. From joeray: As a graduate of St. Edward HS and now a trial attorney for the past 30 years, I find this news very troubling. No matter how you justify it, drug testing without cause is wrong. The fact that this was raised as a threat is against everything we've been taught about a free society. If a student is on heroine, it will be a fatter of a day or two before their actions, grades or demeanor will give them away. I have been a big supporter of the Jesuit Community but this decision stands as a black eye on a community that strives to perpetuate social justice. Students, it's your turn... Stand up and reject this act of tyranny. Parents, support your kids... From Cleveland2006: Even as a parent, I'm very much against this. People do have a constitutional right to privacy, and I personally feel that drug testing all students across the board is a violation of that. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled (for public schools) that they could drug test students participating in competitive extracurricular activities. Fine. But that leads me to believe that it stopped there because drug testing all students isn't constitutional. And regardless of whether you go to a public school or a private school, rights are rights. I am happy to see that students won't face disciplinary consequences if they fail, but that makes me wonder--what if they fail a second time? A third time? What happens then? I'd also be interested to know how the drug testing is paid for--after doing a little research, hair testing seems to be an expensive option. Would that cost be absorbed by a rise in tuition or something else? And who pays for the counseling/therapy? This just fee! ls so intrusive to me. Our right to privacy seems to dissolve more and more every day. From PubliusX: Parents have the right to choose. The information presented here will help them make the right choice. For me, that would be to change schools. From JB-Cleve: This is an excellent idea it gives every student a good reason to say "sorry I can't do it I have to pass a drug test". The one unfortunate consequence I see is the students will increase alcohol use which cannot be detected by the hair test. The three month look-back period will kill their summer fun. I predict a lot of shaved heads in school in the fall. From gimpyegl04: I went to St. Ed and have plenty of friends that went to Iggy (by virtue of going to XU), and I can say unequivocally that this will hurt both schools. Between pot (Eds) and cocaine (Iggy), there will be a lot of students being disciplined. I say "disciplined" instead of "treated" because that is simply the catholic style. Although, that may be different now that JK and Danny B are running the respective shows; both leaders of these institutions are a bit more understanding than their orthodox predecessors. However, the general premise of these young men being at these institutions is to be held to a higher standard, so I'm not entirely against the testing Twitter was also abuzz with reaction. - --- MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom