Pubdate: Thu, 15 May 2014
Source: New Zealand Herald (New Zealand)
Copyright: 2014 New Zealand Herald
Contact:  http://www.nzherald.co.nz/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/300
Author: Simon Collins
Page: A2

HULSE: ACCEPT CANNABIS USE

Auckland Deputy Mayor Says Natural Drug Safer Than Synthetic and 
Should Be Decriminalised

Auckland Deputy Mayor Penny Hulse says it is time to decriminalise 
natural cannabis because it is safer than the synthetic versions that 
were banned last week.

The veteran councillor and former industrial laboratory technician 
said she had always opposed decriminalisation, but changed her mind 
after reading scientific papers about the dangers of synthetic cannabis.

Yesterday, she told an Auckland Council committee drawing up a policy 
on " legal highs" that it made no sense to regulate when synthetic 
cannabis could be sold without considering safer alternatives.

"I think we need to take a deep breath in this conversation and say, 
'What are we trying to achieve? Are we going to deal with the issue 
that people are going to make choices to smoke things that get them 
stoned? Have we been able to stop people doing that?' Absolutely we haven't."

Ms Hulse stressed she was speaking personally and not for the council.

Mayor Len Brown said through a spokesman that he welcomed last week's 
ban on synthetic cannabis but also supported the status quo, which 
bans natural cannabis.

"He is comfortable with the fact that Penny has a view of it," the 
spokesman said.

Another councillor who heard Ms Hulse's comments, former senior 
police officer George Wood, said he strongly opposed her view.

"We would just be opening the floodgates if we legalised cannabis. We 
have got enough problems with alcohol and other drugs," he said.

"I was surprised when Penny said that this morning. I don't know if 
she has really thought it through."

Ms Hulse said she was speaking as "someone from a scientific 
background" with " a deep and abiding passion for science". She 
personally loathed cannabis.

"I have two grandchildren. The idea that they would choose to smoke 
cannabis or any legal highs breaks my heart," she said.

But toxicologists had shown that natural cannabis contained several 
compounds with an anti-psychotic effect to balance the psychoactive 
effects of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), so it was less dangerous than 
synthetic products designed to match exactly receptors in the brain.

Despite last week's ban on 41 synthetic cannabis products, the 
Government still planned to allow the sale of synthetic products that 
could be shown in clinical trials to have a low risk. But last week's 
amended law also banned animal trials for recreational drugs, and 
that meant there was now no safe way to test their safety.

"Without animal testing it's a desktop exercise," Ms Hulse said, "and 
if you do a desktop exercise of a theoretical combination as a result 
of chemical experiments, well then you are basically saying let's go 
out and test them on our kids and our families.

"My concern is that we now go, 'We have banned them, we are going to 
do this sort of theoretical testing of them, then suddenly the way 
forward will emerge'.

"And I think we are kind of missing the point, which is that these 
so-called legal highs may never be safe and continuing to ban them 
out of hand is not an option without looking at alternatives."

Council staff said the national "legal high" market was estimated at 
$140 million a year before the ban and each shop was selling an 
average of $40,000 to $80,000 worth a week.
- ---
MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom