Pubdate: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 Source: Windsor Star (CN ON) Copyright: 2014 The Windsor Star Contact: http://www.canada.com/windsorstar/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/501 Author: Douglas Quan Page: A 10 Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/find?224 (Cannabis and Driving) DRUG-IMPAIRED DRIVING LAW 'CUMBERSOME' TO ENFORCE Six years after federal law changes gave police new powers to compel suspected drug-impaired drivers to take roadside sobriety tests, watchdogs say the system has been ineffective, resulting in few charges. But there is no consensus as to what should be done about it. A B.C. technology company is producing what it says will be the first commercial marijuana-detecting breathalyzer, but a prototype is still a few months away from release and needs further testing. The advocacy group MADD Canada recently went to Parliament Hill to push the idea of random roadside saliva testing - a system already in use in Australia and Europe but is likely to draw concerns about civil liberties here. And unlike the 0.08 per cent blood alcohol concentration threshold, there's no scientific consensus about how much consumption of certain drugs will cause impairment, further complicating matters. "Were moving forward. We're not quite there yet," said Doug Beirness, an impaired-driving research consultant in Ontario. The current challenges aren't a complete surprise, Beirness said. Just look at the introduction in 1969 of the national breathalyzer law to combat drunk drivers. It was fraught with growing pains, and lawyers are still arguing the reliability of the devices today. "Any piece of technology will be challenged. And it will be challenged almost continuously." Under 2008 Criminal Code amendments, an officer who suspects a driver may be impaired by drugs can demand that the driver take part in a physical co-ordination test, known as a Standardized Field Sobriety Test. If the driver fails that test, the officer can compel the driver to go to the police station for a lengthier evaluation by a certified drug-recognition expert. If, at the end of that evaluation, the expert believes the driver is impaired by a particular drug, the expert can order the driver to submit a blood, urine or saliva sample to confirm the presence of that drug. - --- MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom