Pubdate: Fri, 01 Aug 2014 Source: Houston Chronicle (TX) Copyright: 2014 Houston Chronicle Publishing Company Division, Hearst Newspaper Contact: http://www.chron.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/198 END PROHIBITION With calls for change coming from across the spectrum, let states dictate marijuana laws. We always knew that marijuana altered the human brain, but it must be more powerful than we thought if it has the famously liberal New York Times editorial board in agreement with Gov. Rick Perry. In a recent editorial, the collective voice of the Grey Lady echoed a sentiment that Perry expressed last year at World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland: Marijuana laws should be dictated by the states, not the federal government. It is a position that this board has reiterated over the past several years. While there are still questions about long-term health effects of marijuana use or the policy implications of decriminalization or legalization, the United States knows all too well the consequences of continuing the war on drugs: millions spent on ineffective law enforcement, drug cartels getting rich and poor people going to jail. The heavy burden of our national marijuana policies is uniquely borne by the black community. While black kids and white kids statistically use marijuana at equal rates, according to a study last year from the American Civil Liberties Union, black kids are 3.73 times more likely to be arrested for possession. Here in Harris County, blacks were 44.9 percent of all marijuana possession arrests in 2010 despite being only 18.9 percent of the population. Colorado and Washington already have legalized recreational marijuana, and 18 other states plus the District of Columbia have legal medical marijuana, but it seems like marijuana possession is de facto decriminalized if you just live in the right neighborhood. These startling statistics belie our nation's promise of equal treatment under the law. It is time for Texas to officially change our own marijuana policies. The discussion already has begun in the race for Harris County district attorney, where Democratic candidate Kim Ogg has said she would punish low-level marijuana possession with tickets and community service instead of arrests and jail time. By her numbers, more than 12,000 people were charged in Harris County last year with possessing less than 4 ounces of marijuana. These prosecutions left county taxpayers on the hook for $4.4"...million. There's also the social cost of taking people away from their jobs and families and shuttling them through an unforgiving criminal justice system. All this for something that is essentially a bad habit and a vice. District Attorney Devon Anderson has said that she's working on her own similar program, but we're skeptical. Just last year, Anderson criticized relaxed rhetoric toward marijuana as acting "recklessly" and promised to vigorously prosecute drug possession. Anderson also entered her office on a promise to continue prosecuting for possession of trace amounts of drugs - amounts so small that they're often difficult to test in labs. These are the positions of someone who puts anti-drug philosophy ahead of effective policy. Then again, Anderson is allowed to change her mind. After decades of a national zero-tolerance drug agenda, states now are demonstrating that there is another way. Advocates for change have new examples and evidence to back their arguments, and it just may be enough to convince some former drug warriors. All this progress relies on restrained prosecutorial discretion from the Department of Justice, which allows local experiments with marijuana regulation to continue unencumbered. Ogg's plan essentially replicates that at a local level. It is a good start, but real change has to come from rewriting outdated laws. At a time when partisanship feels worse than ever, this is an area where even the New York Times and Rick Perry can agree. - --- MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom