Pubdate: Sat, 28 Mar 2015 Source: Washington Post (DC) Copyright: 2015 The Washington Post Company Contact: http://www.washingtonpost.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/491 THE WEED THAT WASN'T In Zealously Punishing an 11-Year-Old, Officials Exhibit Clouded Judgment. THE NEWS is full of instances in which deficits in common sense produce bad outcomes. But rarely is the deficit so clear, or the outcome so wretched, as in the case of a sixth-grade boy in Bedford County, Va., who received a year-long suspension from school for possessing a single leaf of marijuana - which, on closer inspection, turned out not to be marijuana at all. The pupil, who is 11, was enrolled in a gifted-and-talented program not far from Roanoke when an assistant principal found the leaf in his backpack in September. Leave aside the possibility - hardly remote in middle school - that the leaf may have been planted as a prank, which the boy's parents suspect is the case; the leaf was not in dried, smokable form, and there is no suggestion that the boy smoked, sold or purchased this particular leaf - or any other. Seized by official zero-tolerance fervor, the boy was, in short order, suspended for 364 days and charged in juvenile court with possession of marijuana. That's how things stood for more than two months until, at a court hearing in November, prosecutors dropped the charge when it turned out that repeated testing proved the leaf was not marijuana. End of story? If only. The school didn't budge. Instead, officials took refuge behind the school system's policy, which prohibits not only controlled substances but also imitations. (Similar policies are in place throughout Virginia, including in Fairfax County, as well as in other states.) We get why schools frown on imitation drugs: No one wants kids on school property peddling bags of oregano or passing off cornstarch as cocaine. But in this case we're talking about an 11-year-old, a single leaf of what may have been Japanese maple or some other marijuana doppelganger and no known attempt at trafficking. Did the boy's offense really merit a year's suspension? His parents, both teachers, are furious. They sued the school system as well as the county sheriff 's office, which filed the erroneous charges against the boy. In the meantime, the school system ordered that the boy be evaluated for substance-abuse problems, which it turns out he doesn't have. "But by then," wrote Dan Casey, who broke the story in the Roanoke Times, "the boy had other problems." His parents says he now suffers from depression and panic attacks and fears being in public. Hardly surprising if you remember that this is an 11-year-old. The school system, after trying to channel the boy into a program for troubled kids, finally allowed him to return this month to a regular school, though not his old one. But he remains on strict probation, meaning even a minor slip-up could result in expulsion. Whatever damage that single leaf could have done, even if it had been marijuana, cannot possibly compare to the harm that has resulted from the school system's policies and actions. The real question is: Why couldn't anyone in Bedford County figure that out? - --- MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom