Pubdate: Sun, 03 May 2015 Source: New Mexican, The (Santa Fe, NM) Copyright: 2015 The Santa Fe New Mexican Contact: http://www.santafenewmexican.com/SendLetter/ Website: http://www.santafenewmexican.com Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/695 Author: Steve Terrell Page: B1 MARIJUANA STILL MORE POPULAR THAN POLITICIANS Right after last November's general election, in this very column, I made the contention that marijuana was more popular than either gubernatorial candidate - Republican Gov. Susana Martinez and Democrat Gary King - at least in Santa Fe and Albuquerque. I made that claim based on the number of votes that (nonbinding) marijuana-decriminalization initiatives received in Santa Fe and Bernalillo counties. In both counties, the pro-marijuana position got more votes than either of the candidates. But Martinez and King shouldn't feel bad. As The Washington Post's Wonkblog pointed out last month, recent polls in large swing states show that marijuana is more popular among voters than any of the 2016 candidates for president. A Quinnipiac University poll conducted in March showed that more than 50 percent of those who responded to the poll in Ohio, Florida and Pennsylvania favor legalizing marijuana. But all the candidates whose names were mentioned got less than a 50 percent favorability rating, except Democrat Hillary Clinton, whose favorability rating inched slightly above the 50 percent mark. But she still lagged behind marijuana. Other candidates, or likely candidates, listed in the poll, all Republicans, were Jeb Bush, Marco Rubio, Rand Cruz, Rand Paul and Chris Christie. Granted, name-recognition at this early stage of the game could be an issue with some of the Republican candidates. (Not Clinton, who's been around nearly as long as marijuana.) But even in Florida, home-state contenders Bush and Rubio were polling behind the Devil's Flower - Bush by 8 percentage points, Rubio by 13. Like recent polls about same-sex marriage, national polling firms are showing increasing support for legalizing cannabis. In fact, a recent Fox News poll showed more than half of Americans supporting legalizing the drug. Fifty-one percent were in favor and 44 were opposed. To be clear: This was Fox News. Not High Times magazine. If the numbers from an Albuquerque Journal poll last September still hold, New Mexico is a little behind the rest of the country. That poll, conducted by Research & Polling Inc., showed 50 percent of those surveyed opposed legalization, while 44 percent favored it. Pollster Brian Sanderoff told the Journal that "age and political party are the biggest predictors of public opinion on the marijuana issue." Sixty-seven percent of the 18-to-34 age group in this state favored legalization in that poll. But only 28 percent of people 65 and over supported it. As for political parties, 55 percent of New Mexico Democrats polled by Research & Polling were for legalization. Only 29 percent of Republicans did. Wonkblog pointed out that high polling numbers for issues like marijuana don't necessarily translate into election victories. "In Florida, for instance, 88 percent of voters said they supported medical marijuana last July. But the state's constitutional amendment to allow medical marijuana failed to gather the 60 percent support it needed to become law last November." The secret there is that older voters are far more likely to go to the polls than the young folks. But the city of Santa Fe has shown that even when you liberalize the laws on marijuana, making possession of small amounts a civil, not a criminal offense - as the City Council did last year - marijuana possessors can still end up being charged in criminal court. As my colleague Daniel J. Chacon reported last month, "Santa Fe police have been citing people strictly under the state criminal statute on marijuana, which carries stiffer penalties." A police spokeswoman told Chacon that it was partly a matter of office supplies. Police only recently got the correct printed forms to charge marijuana offenders with civil infractions. The council passed the ordinance in September. The real problem is that city police have the discretion to charge under the city ordinance or state statute. That means the elected City Council can pass an ordinance, the public can endorse it in huge numbers at the polls, then unelected police officers have the power to ignore it. No wonder youngsters are so cynical about voting. - --- MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom