Pubdate: Mon, 11 May 2015 Source: Metro (Vancouver, CN BC) Copyright: 2015 Metro Canada Contact: http://www.metronews.ca/vancouver Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/3775 Author: Neal Hall Page: 4 MEDICINAL POT USER CLAIMS DISCRIMINATION OVER CHOICE OF SMOKE A member of the Royal Canadian Legion club in Parksville has filed a B. C. human rights complaint, alleging he has been discriminated against because he was banned from the club after smoking medical marijuana in the club's designated smoking area. Jonathan Starnes claims he is prescribed medical marijuana for pain and alleges that on July 1, 2014, while smoking pot in the Legion Branch 49's designated smoking area, he was verbally insulted, assaulted, threatened and harassed by other members, then was asked to leave the premises. Starnes, a Legion member for 11 years, says the incident has resulted in him being permanently banned from the Legion, which amounts to discrimination against his physical disability. The Legion, in its response, said it had numerous discussions with Starnes about his using marijuana on its premises. It had asked him to refrain from doing so pending further advice the Legion sought from the RCMP and Health Canada. During the July 1 altercation "Starnes assumed an aggressive stance and police were called," the Legion said. The Legion said it filed an internal complaint after the incident and Starnes declined to attend the Legion hearing of the complaint on Aug. 11 last year, when Starnes' membership was suspended for six months. The Legion filed an application to dismiss Starnes' complaint without a hearing before the B. C. Human Rights Tribunal. The Legion asserted that the Marijuana for Medical Purposes Regulations, which allow those who have a Health Canada exemption to possess medical marijuana, do not provide a right to smoke pot in public. The Legion argued that smoking pot on its property is not a service customarily provided to its members. Starnes says that he is entitled to use marijuana in any regulated smoking area. "This assertion would require evidence to define the service in issue," Tribunal chair Bernd Walter said in a ruling on May 5, when Walter denied the Legion's application to dismiss the complaint, while making no findings on the merits of the complaint. He urged the parties to try to sort out the matter before going to a tribunal hearing. "I recommend the parties engage in assertive efforts to resolve this complaint without resorting to a protracted evidentiary hearing. The Tribunal is prepared to assist in such efforts," Walter said in his decision. - --- MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom