Pubdate: Sun, 17 May 2015 Source: Victoria Times-Colonist (CN BC) Copyright: 2015 Times Colonist Contact: http://www2.canada.com/victoriatimescolonist/letters.html Website: http://www.timescolonist.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/481 Author: Lawrie McFarlane SCHOOL OFFICIALS SHOULDN'T IGNORE DUE PROCESS A few months ago, school officials in Quebec City strip-searched a 15-year old-pupil. The girl was suspected of having drugs on her person, though none were found. The province's education minister at the time said he was OK with this. He was promptly thrown under the bus after an entirely predictable eruption of public outrage. But this apparently left local educators in a tizzy. After all, if you can't strip-search students, how is order to be kept? Fortunately, the Education Ministry had an answer. A former Crown prosecutor was given terms of reference for a study. Specifically, he was asked this question: If strip searches at the instigation of a school official are out, how may they be conducted? His answer? A police officer should conduct the search. No doubt that reassured school kids everywhere. But the broader question surely is, what were those school administrators thinking in the first place? Are educators honestly equipped to perform such a brutish, intrusive procedure? And how, in the aftermath, would any teacher or administrator be able to face a student they had violated in this manner? Or the kid's parents? Or a lynch mob, for that matter? Aren't schools meant to be a haven of safety and caring? What happened to zero tolerance of violence? Regrettably, though, this is only the most recent manifestation of an unfortunate and creeping trend. The last couple of years have seen a series of situations where local school authorities have taken it upon themselves to investigate matters well beyond their purview. A substitute teacher in Ontario, Susan Dowell, was sent home from school one day. For more than a week, no one would tell her why. It turned out two students had confected an ugly story about her, after she scolded one for some minor piece of mischief. The Children's Aid Society conducted a full-scale investigation, and cleared the teacher completely. But that wasn't sufficient for the local school board. They set out to mount an inquisition of their own. "We have a much closer eye and a more detailed approach," said a board official. Dowell was eventually exonerated - a second time. Then there was the instance recently in Nanaimo, where a teacher was fired over allegations of sexual assault on a student. The allegations were transparently false - they mirrored plot lines in a TV reality show. But although the Crown prosecutor declined to file criminal charges - a clear indication the whole thing was bogus - the school board carried out its own investigation, and dismissed the teacher anyway. A distinction is needed here. If a staff member is alleged to have committed an act of professional malpractice, it might indeed be appropriate for the school to investigate. If the complaint, say, has to do with poor classroom preparation, by all means let those knowledgeable in such matters take charge. But when the issue involves a potentially criminal act, there is no way it should be handled intramurally. For one thing, the consequences are far too serious to be dealt with in this manner. Then again, most educators have no experience with the requirements of due process. There is also a significant legal jeopardy here for any school board that takes on such a responsibility. Get in over your head or mess things up, and you could be facing a major lawsuit. Surely this is something the Education Ministry might address. We need some clear guidance as to which offences school boards can properly investigate, and which belong in the hands of law-enforcement agencies. Instead, it feels as if our schools have embarked, almost without realizing it, on a form of mission creep that will poison their relationship with the community around them. I can't believe this is a wise path to follow. - --- MAP posted-by: Matt