Pubdate: Mon, 18 May 2015 Source: Oklahoman, The (OK) Copyright: 2015 The Oklahoma Publishing Co. Contact: http://www.newsok.com/voices/guidelines Website: http://newsok.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/318 Author: Nolan Clay FORFEITURE FRAY Senator Denies Claims That Plan to Change Law Is Grab for Money A state senator has upset law enforcement officers across the state by saying the state's drug money forfeiture law needs to be changed to protect the innocent. "Completely asinine," said the most vocal critic, Canadian County Sheriff Randall Edwards. At issue is the law as written allows police - in some instances - to seize and keep cash found during traffic stops even when no drugs were discovered and no criminal charges were filed. Sen. Kyle Loveless, R-Oklahoma City, calls the current law un-American and subject to abuse. The senator on May 6 introduced a bill to change the law. He calls it the "Personal Asset Protection Act." His plan is to push for the reform to be passed next year after a study of the issue between legislative sessions. His proposal would allow cash, cars, planes and other assets to be forfeited only after a conviction for a drug offense. Opponents of civil forfeiture laws have been pushing for changes nationwide, bolstered by widely publicized anecdotes of questionable seizures or traffic stops. The Institute for Justice, a civil liberties group, calls the practice "policing for profit." New Mexico this year reformed its procedures, basically always requiring a conviction for asset forfeiture. "I started just researching it," Loveless said. "And the more I researched it, the more angry and the more upset I got. ... I don't want to get rid of it. What I want to do is put safeguards into place ... so law enforcement agencies don't have an incentive to take things illegally." He also said, "There are instances all across the country - a poker player that wins $5,000 in cash. Well, a police officer thinks he looks like a gangster or whatever, pulls him over, takes the money. It costs him eight grand to get the five grand back. That is not the America that I think we want to live in." In letters to state newspapers, Edwards accuses Loveless of duplicity, claiming the senator's true intent in introducing the bill is to use the forfeited money to help finance state operations. He wrote the senator is not pointing out that the forfeited funds under his reform bill would go into the state's general fund. Currently, forfeited funds go back to the law enforcement agencies. "Don't make any mistake about it, the only thing the proponents of this bill are fighting for is the money! Period! And they are disguising it as they are helping to protect the innocent!" Edwards complained. He also predicted drug stops along Oklahoma's highways would come to an end if the law passes because legislators would keep all of the money that had been used to pay for such law enforcement efforts. "Not a red cent would go toward fighting drug cartels!" he wrote in his letter. "How do I know that? Because they are not contributing a red cent toward fighting the war on drugs to my agency now!" He also contended that those facing forfeiture of assets already have due process because a judge makes the final decision. And he explained how money could be seized even if no criminal charge is filed. "When we stop someone and they have a huge amount of cash, shrink wrapped and hidden in containers of coffee, and the driver has drug trafficking convictions or multiple drug charges on his or her criminal record, then denies ownership or knowledge of the origin of the suspected contraband and then signs a non-ownership affidavit, I think it's a fair assumption he or she is hiding the fact it's drug proceeds," the sheriff wrote. Concerns With Interstate 40 cutting through Canadian County, traffic stops have proved helpful to law enforcement efforts. In a stop in Canadian County in May 2013, a state trooper found a package of cocaine and $1,250,035 in cash hidden underneath the mattress in the sleeper of a tractor-trailer headed from Chicago to Los Angeles. The Canadian County sheriff's office has been awarded almost $400,000 in forfeited assets since July 1, 2009. Judicial decisions in pending forfeiture cares could give the sheriff's office $1.6 million more. Others with concerns include Oklahoma City Police Chief Bill Citty. "I have some concerns about it," Citty said. "We almost totally fund all of our covert operations in dealing with narcotics and other issues with asset forfeiture funds." Loveless said the bill could be changed to address law enforcement concerns. He denied it is a grab for money to solve the state's financial problems. "I don't think there's enough to solve our problems any way," he said. - --- MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom