Pubdate: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 Source: Oregonian, The (Portland, OR) Copyright: 2015 The Oregonian Contact: http://www.oregonlive.com/oregonian/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/324 A FAIR, IF WRENCHING, DEAL FOR URBAN-RURAL POT DIVIDE It took barely 10 minutes for members of the Legislature's Joint Committee on Implementing Measure 91 to zip through complex amendments to a voluminous and complex bill that will, if approved by the House and Senate, establish the new day for legal marijuana in Oregon. It would take a few years to know whether it really works to the satisfaction of Oregonians. The slam-it-through approval by the committee on Monday night was long and contentious in the preparation, however. The amendments represented a response by committee members to a late-in-the-game defection by Sen. Ted Ferrioli, R-John Day, on behalf of eastern Oregon voters who disapprove of legally available marijuana. The compromise amendments to House Bill 3400 thus take a successful statewide measure and apply special treatment to those counties whose votes were 55 percent or more against it by allowing their governing bodies without a public vote to ban recreational pot shops and medical marijuana dispensaries. Some 15 counties had 55 percent or more opposition to Measure 91 and all are east of the Cascades, represented entirely or in part by Ferrioli. The opt-out approach can work but needs close watching for recalibration down the line. While it is disappointing that some terms of Measure 91's implementation might vary by region with HB3400's passage, the proposed law at least preserves the ability of Oregonians to hold a vote to overturn any decision by their local governing body to ban pot. Committee member Rep. Ken Helm, D-Beaverton, correctly signaled caution after Monday night's blitz vote: "We've entrusted local officials with a lot. Voters did not want that. If local governing bodies prejudice themselves against otherwise legal businesses, I will be watching." Ferrioli had offered a glimpse of his thinking, if not legislatively, at a recent Big Idea forum conducted by the editorial board of The Oregonian/OregonLive. At that "Get pot right" debate, Ferrioli closed out his comments by urging a pro-pot, Portland audience to allow folks who are opposed to legal marijuana time to adjust. People, Ferrioli had said of his home constituencies, "tighten up" if forced to do something they don't want to do, "so please be patient." Think Prohibition and dry counties, which opted out of legal alcohol and in subsequent years would make booze available. But politics is a contact sport, and Ferrioli's recent pleas were heard by his lawmaking colleagues because the influential Republican's support was viewed as essential to successful implementation of Measure 91. Committee members wisely judged that time is running out to get the state's pot program off the ground. At Ferrioli's suggestion on Monday, it waived off further assessments of revenue impacts of the bill to send it to lawmakers straightaway for consideration. Among other things, the bill brings strict accountability and production limits to medical marijuana, to be overseen by the Oregon Health Authority, and requires clear labeling of marijuana potencies and dosing. The bill also requires product testing for pesticides a smart requirement in light of a recent series by Noelle Crombie of The Oregonian/OregonLive that many medical marijuana products showed contamination. The Legislature should say yes to HB3400 knowing full well that when Oregonians passed Measure 91 last November they expressed a clear desire to create a legal and competitive marijuana marketplace in a timely fashion, with legal personal possession beginning July 1. With the bill's passage, the Oregon Liquor Control Commission, unable to write regulations in the absence of a statutory framework, will be able to accelerate implementation, ensuring licenses are granted and stores open up in 2016. Committee co-chair Sen. Ginny Burdick, D-Portland, recently told Jeff Mapes of The Oregonian/OregonLive that HB3400, with its amendments, "allows cities and counties to ban (stores and dispensaries) but not lock it in stone," arguing that elected officials could more easily change course later on than if voters had supported a ban. This sentiment best captures the compromise brought upon the committee by Ferrioli resulting in a bill that committee co-chair Rep. Ann Lininger, D-Lake Oswego, described on Monday as hard-won, if imperfect, and good enough to get the job done. "We've been a phoenix rising from the ashes many times in this process," she said. True enough. But best that all phoenixes rise and fall in Salem now than later on, as legal recreational marijuana takes hold alongside a more tightly regulated medical marijuana program in some Oregon communities but not others. - --- MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom