Pubdate: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 Source: Observer, The (Rio Rancho, NM) Contact: http://www.rrobserver.com/site/forms/?mode=letters Copyright: 2015 Rio Rancho Observer. Website: http://www.rrobserver.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/2299 RRPS RANDOM DRUG TESTS SHOULD INCLUDE CHECKS FOR STEROIDS We applaud the Rio Rancho Public Schools Board of Education for adopting the area's first random drug-testing policy for student athletes. Hopefully, it will go a long way toward making a student who elects to go out for a sports team think twice about using alcohol, marijuana, amphetamines, opiates and other substances the contractor selected to handle the program will test for. We are disappointed, though, that the program will omit steroid tests. While district policy prohibits steroid use, the board was informed that testing for them would be too costly to include in the program. Much as we support the policy as a deterrent against substance abuse and recognize there is a larger cost involved, it makes little sense to us to leave performance-enhancing drugs out of the mix if the aim is to discourage all substance abuse. The district's coaches may not perceive steroids to be a problem in RRPS athletics and we have no particular reason to suspect they are, either. But as we stated previously in support of the policy, the district's become known statewide for its achievements in boys and girls sports at Rio Rancho and Cleveland high schools. The number of athletes from Rio Rancho who move on to compete collegiately is, indeed, impressive. The district is rightly proud of that success. But it should also be committed to preserving the integrity of its athletic programs. To skirt the possibility that some athlete would be tempted to use steroids, knowing they're not on the test list, seems to fall short of that. Perhaps it's possible to test for steroids randomly but less frequently than the tests for other drugs to hold down the costs. In our mind, that still would be an effective deterrent and enable the district to better enforce its own policy. It's not too late for the board to reopen that discussion. - --- MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom