Pubdate: Tue, 04 Aug 2015 Source: New York Post (NY) Copyright: 2015 N.Y.P. Holdings, Inc. Contact: http://www.nypost.com/postopinion/letters/letters_editor.htm Website: http://www.nypost.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/296 Author: Karol Markowicz TRUTH FOR DARE Why Marijuana Decriminalization Is Inevitable IT seems appropriate that an organization called DARE would do something bold. Grow and behold: Marijuana plants in Arlington, Wash., where recreational pot is legal. That's what seemed to happen last week, when Drug Abuse Resistance Education, the wellknown anti-drug group - which has schoolchildren sign pledges to abstain from drugs and report on their parents if they see them engaging in drug use - seemingly did the unthinkable. It posted an op-ed calling for the legalization of marijuana. The author of the piece, a self-described former deputy sheriff named Carlis McDerment, noted he supports legalization because marijuana has become extremely difficult to control and because he wants to "reduce youths' drug use." This was especially surprising since these are the exact arguments that DARE has consistently rejected since its founding in 1983. Turns out, DARE aggregates articles on its Web site that include certain key words; the publishing of this article was an accident. When Christopher Ingraham of The Washington Post contacted them to see if they had indeed reversed course on marijuana legalization, he found that they had reprinted the article because the title, "Purchasing Marijuana Puts Kids at Risk," made it sound as if it was anti-legalization. Unfortunately for DARE, the story that they support legalizing marijuana was much bigger than their correction. New York magazine called DARE's "new" position a "breakthrough" while the UK Independent called it "a bold move." Twitter lit up with comments about "pigs flying," "hell freezing over" and proclamations that the drug war was officially lost. But the mixup was still newsworthy for a simple reason: It was believable that DARE would embrace legalization. The reason so many easily believed that DARE reversed course is that the country is moving toward, if not legalization of marijuana, then at least decriminalization. Twenty states have either decriminalized or have set a date to do so. Four states, Colorado, Washington, Alaska and Oregon, as well as the District of Columbia, have entirely legalized marijuana. There's a sense that, as with gay marriage, the country is moving in a certain direction and it's futile to stand in the way. It seems that no one has alerted Chuck Rosenberg of the shift in opinion. Rosenberg, the new acting administrator of the US Drug Enforcement Administration, last week said he couldn't say for certain whether marijuana is as dangerous as heroin because he is "not an expert." Why a non-expert is running the DEA is unclear. But with heroin use at an all-time high, comparing marijuana to it only minimizes the risk of heroin. Rosenberg's answer is considered more moderate; after all, his predecessor once compared marijuana use to smoking crack cocaine. Yet what Rosenberg seems to be missing, and what DARE appeared to have glommed onto, is the growing popular consensus that it's possible to take marijuana use very seriously while believing that using it shouldn't be a jailable offense. The numbers are well-known at this point: Marijuana kills far fewer people each year than any of the hard street drugs, prescribed pharmaceutical drugs or legal drugs like alcohol and cigarettes. Death from marijuana use comes primarily from car crashes or other types of accidents. But even that is misleading, since marijuana in a person's system can mean he smoked a week ago and wasn't high at the time of the accident. That doesn't mean it's harmless. But the price that we pay for keeping it illegal, the insane incarceration rates, the DEA and police power we waste on stopping it, far outweigh the danger of marijuana addiction. According to the National Institute of Drug Abuse, all drug use keeps increasing. In 2007 there were 14.5 million marijuana users. Five years later that number is 19.8 million. We've thrown enough money and resources at the problem of drug use while yielding the opposite result we had hoped for. If we insist on fighting drug use, the rational move is to decriminalize marijuana and use the vast resources the marijuana fight currently consumes to battle more serious drugs. Our current system hasn't worked in a long time. Even DARE almost said so - and people believed it. - --- MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom