Pubdate: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 Source: Blade, The (Toledo, OH) Copyright: 2015 The Blade Contact: http://www.toledoblade.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/48 Author: Tom Troy UT MARIJUANA FORUM OFFERS PROS - NO CONS - OF LEGAL USE The proposed constitutional amendment to legalize recreational and medical marijuana use was the subject of a forum Monday at the University of Toledo that had advocates but no opponents. About 60 people attended the invitation-only event that was planned as an informational session for mental health and substance-abuse professionals and elected officials. Scott Sylak, director of the Board of Mental Health and Recovery Services, said after his first anti-Issue 3 speaker backed out, he tried Friday to get someone from the newly organized anti-Issue 3 group to attend, but they had no one knowledgeable about the proposed amendment. Mr. Sylak said he would schedule a follow-up forum to hear from the opponents. The panel consisted of Ian James, executive director of ResponsibleOhio, which is trying to pass the Ohio constitutional amendment; Douglas Berman, a law professor specializing in marijuana reform issues at the Ohio State University, and F. Scott Hall, PhD, a University of Toledo pharmacy faculty member. Mr. Berman was paid by the ResponsibleOhio campaign to draft the proposed "Fresh Start" legislation backed by ResponsibleOhio that would allow people who have been convicted of marijuana-related crimes to seek expungement if marijuana is legalized. Mr. Hall was invited by the board as an independent scholar. Mr. Sylak said he recruited Mr. Berman to speak but didn't know about the possible conflict. He asked Tony Coder, assistant director of the Drug-Free Action Alliance, to speak, but Mr. Coder declined, saying the panel was not balanced. He said Mr. Berman should have acknowledged his connection with ResponsibleOhio at the outset and should have been more explicit during his presentation at the forum, which was held at the University of Toledo Scott Park campus. "I wish he had been a little more forthcoming in his relationship to ResponsibleOhio when I spoke to him," Mr. Sylak said. He said he inquired Friday through his state organization to the newly minted Ohioans Against Marijuana Monopolies for a speaker but they had no one qualified to talk about the pros and cons of Issue 3. Jen Detwiler, a spokesman for the organization, said, "We were contacted Friday afternoon by the Ohio Association of County Behavioral Health Authorities about finding a replacement, but were then told they no longer needed someone." Mr. Berman said after the meeting that he attended the forum at his own expense. During the forum, Mr. James argued that marijuana legalization will free up $120 million spent annually in Ohio on marijuana enforcement and that people who have financial need will receive assistance in getting medical marijuana if they have their doctor's recommendation. "Under Issue 3, there's money from the commercial sale of marijuana for treatment services," Mr. James said, alluding to taxes that would be charged for sales of legal marijuana. "Drug dealers don't pay taxes." Mr. Berman said the vote on Issue 3, set for Nov. 3 statewide, won't be the final word on marijuana legalization. "At least we're finally starting to have a serious conversation," Mr. Berman said. During the question-and-answer period, Mr. Hall was asked about the effect expanded marijuana use will have on impaired driving. He said the role of marijuana in causing accidents is "minor compared to alcohol." "So often people who are in accidents and test positive for marijuana have been drinking and using other drugs. It's very difficult to know how much is caused by marijuana use alone," he said. Mr. Berman said after the event that he does not believe that ResponsibleOhio's system of 10 licensed commercial growers will last long even if the measure passes because of growing national pressure to legalize pot and because of how easy pot is to grow. Also Monday, ResponsibleOhio released a copy of its second television commercial, a 30-second ad featuring retired Cincinnati police Capt. Howard Rahtz calling the war on drugs a failure and asking for a "yes" vote on the issue. The ad began running Monday on cable and broadcast television statewide, a ResponsibleOhio spokesman said. The anti-Issue 3 organization Ohioans Against Marijuana Monopolies called the ad an "expensive attempt to buy their way into Ohio's Constitution." Also Monday, three statewide education associations representing school boards, administrators, and business officials declared their opposition to Issue 3. The groups said the amendment allows too many marijuana retail outlets, more than 1,100, and allows personal possession of enough pot the make more than 500 marijuana joints. - --- MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom