Pubdate: Sat, 12 Sep 2015 Source: Denver Post (CO) Copyright: 2015 The Denver Post Corp Contact: http://www.denverpost.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/122 Author: Ricardo Baca POT ADVOCATES LASH OUT OVER PULLED MEASURE Supporters Argue for Social Use of Marijuana After activists last week pulled a Denver marijuana initiative from the November ballot, other pro-legalization activists have lashed out at what they see as backpedaling by their likeminded colleagues. Had the initiative passed, it would have allowed limited social marijuana use in businesses such as art galleries and bars. The National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws' lead counsel, Keith Stroup, called the move "embarrassing" in a scathing essay. Drug reform activists in Denver - some of whom had campaigned on behalf of the now-dead social use initiative - called the move "disappointing" and said they felt "lied to" and "used as a pawn in someone else's backroom dealings with the government." Activists Mason Tvert and Brian Vicente, co-authors of Colorado's marijuana-legalizing Amendment 64 in 2012 and the primary voices behind the social use proposition, said they never misled their supporters, and that they were always planning on moving ahead with the consumption initiative until productive conversations with city government and the marijuana industry started to blossom. "I actually had asked my boss for the ability to take two months of unpaid leave from (the Marijuana Policy Project) to run this campaign and had already spoken to some of our staff members about how we were going to account for my absence," said Tvert, communications lead at MPP. "We were very serious and still are very serious. This isn't over." Tvert and Vicente announced their push for a social cannabis use initiative in mid-June, when they proposed allowing "adults 21 and older to consume marijuana in designated areas and venues," Tvert said at the time. Denver's hospitality industry, however, balked, presenting a potential disconnect among some of the venues that would decide on hosting vaping, edibles consumption and outdoor cannabis smoking. In August, the campaign submitted 10,700 petition signatures - more than twice as many as needed - to the Denver Elections office. So supporters were surprised in early September when the social use activists pulled the measure one day before it was to be certified for this November's ballot. The advocates now say they wish to craft a compromise with city and business leaders. "We're not approaching the withdrawal of this initiative lightly," Tvert said. "We believe that cannabis users deserve the freedom to congregate and socialize to the same extent as alcohol users." - --- MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom