Pubdate: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 Source: Daily Astorian, The (OR) Copyright: 2015 The Daily Astorian Contact: http://www.dailyastorian.info/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/1629 Author: Hillary Borrud OHA HAS LIMITED DATA ON MEDICAL POT GROWS The Oregon Health Authority, which manages the state's medical pot program, probably does not have data on numbers of plants at grow sites at the end of 2014. This surprised lawmakers, who passed a bill earlier this year allowing those grow sites to be grandfathered in with more plants than otherwise allowed. SALEM - Oregon public health officials are running into difficulty implementing a law that legislators passed earlier this year to gain control over the largely unregulated medical marijuana supply chain and prevent drug traffickers from diverting pot into the black market in other states. A top official at the Oregon Health Authority told lawmakers last week the agency might not have the data necessary to implement a key provision of the new law aimed at curtailing huge pot grows that have blossomed in the state's medical program. Starting in March, the law limits medical marijuana grows to 12 mature plants in city residential zones and 48 plants in other city zones and rural areas. The Legislature included a provision to grandfather in some of the larger grows that existed on Dec. 31, 2014, with total plants in these gardens capped at 24 in urban residential zones and 96 plants in all other urban and rural zones. Priscilla Lewis, deputy director of the authority's Public Health Division, told lawmakers during a Sept. 30 hearing that employees at the agency might not be able to figure out how many plants each medical marijuana grow site had on Dec. 31, 2014. "I believe we have limited ability to do that," Lewis said. "We would certainly be willing to give it our best shot. But we have discussed this previously, and I can't remember the limitations on the data, but there are some limitations on the data as we currently collect it." Lewis was responding to a question from state Sen. Ginny Burdick, D-Portland, co-chair of the Joint Interim Committee On Marijuana Legalization and one of the legislators who worked on the law to regulate the medical marijuana industry. Lewis' answer appeared to take Burdick by surprise. "We put it in the legislation people could not have the increased plant counts, unless they had the larger number effective Dec 31, 2014," Burdick said. "Are you saying that that was a meaningless restriction?" Lewis demurred, saying " I don't have a further answer, but we can get you a further answer." Shannon O'Fallon, a senior assistant attorney general who advises the health authority, said health authority employees who manage Oregon's medical marijuana program know they need to figure out which grow sites qualify to be grandfathered in with higher plant numbers. They simply have not completed that data analysis, O'Fallon said. "I just don't know that they have those numbers right now, and would be able to tell which grow sites would be limited and which ones wouldn't," O'Fallon said during the legislative meeting. The health authority tracks data on the numbers of medical marijuana patients connected to grow sites around the state. In the current medical marijuana program, cardholders can have six mature plants and 18 immature plants at any one time. Cardholders also have the option of hiring a grower to produce the crop under the same limits. Each grower can serve four patients, which would a single grower could have up to 24 plants. In practice, multiple growers are often registered at a single garden through a practice known as card stacking. The Oregonian reported earlier this year the largest grow site in the state serves 104 medical pot patients. The newspaper also reported all the Oregon medical marijuana patients supposedly served by the site lived in California, mostly in the southern portion of the state. The health authority never inspected medical marijuana grow sites and does not have the regulatory authority to do so, agency spokesman Jonathan Modie wrote in an email. The agency will gain the authority to inspect grow sites when that portion of the new law takes effect in March. As a result, it appears regulators do not know the actual numbers of plants at grow sites around the state on Dec. 31, 2014. A week after Burdick raised the question at the legislative hearing, the health authority is still working on an answer. "The Oregon Public Health Division is developing a system that would allow it to create a list of medical marijuana grow sites that may qualify to be "grandfathered" under (House Bill) 3400 and permitted to have additional plants," Modie wrote in an email. "Options being discussed include working with the Oregon Health Authority's information systems staff to develop a database query on grow site addresses that would qualify, and requiring persons responsible for grow sites to petition the (Oregon Medical Marijuana Program) to be a grandfathered grow site. Discussions on this issue are ongoing." The health authority would not reveal who is involved in those discussions. The agency is responsible for implementing many other regulations in the new law, including a system that will for the first time track the medical marijuana supply from growers to processors and dispensaries. It's unclear whether the agency has made progress on the tracking system, because Lewis and Modie declined to provide any information on it. Lawmakers had hoped that once marijuana became legal in July for all Oregonians age 21 and older, people who previously enrolled in the medical marijuana program because it was the only legal option to possess pot would opt for the state's new recreational pot system. People have to pay for annual doctor's visits and application fees to remain in the medical marijuana program, but some clinics that specialize in helping people qualify for the program tout the larger possession limits, both for plants and usable marijuana, as reasons people should choose the medical pot program. "We have heard that there has been a spike of some degree in the medical cards and you kind of wonder why that's happening, since we really expected to see a decline as people who were truly recreational users didn't need to have the expense or time to get a card," Burdick said. In the end, Burdick asked health authority staff to report back to lawmakers in November with answers about the plant limits and other issues. - --- MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom