Pubdate: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 Source: Marlborough Express (New Zealand) Copyright: 2015 Independent Newspapers Limited Contact: http://www.marlboroughexpress.co.nz/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/1139 Author: Jane Bowron DUNNE DEAL ON DRUGS MAKES SENSE While some may view the government dishing out of tips on howto get high safely as cynical and degenerate, surely this is a health issue rather than a moral one? Last week's announcement by Associate Health Minister Peter Dunne that government experts may be able to offer advice on recreational drug-taking will probably go down like a cup of cold sick with conservative Kiwis. In Dunne's time as associate minister, the very flexible centrist politician who prides himself on his common sense has been learning on the job, his rocky journey into legal highs taking him to professional lows. During that debacle it was revealed Dunne's son James was a lawyer working as a key lobbyist for legal highs. At the same time broadcaster John Campbell invited the minister to accompany him on an early morning stakeout outside seedy premises trading in legal highs to witness the desperation of users of the so-called harmless drug. The minister admitted he was shocked at what he saw. The floating of Dunne's latest idea for government experts to help drug users learn safe limits to minimise harm is a hard call for any politician in government to make. And it signals how far attitudes have changed since Nixon declared war on drugs and Reagan instigated his hypocritical "Just Say No" campaign (during Reagan's administration the CIA were accomplices to a large narcotics smuggling ring to the US by the Contras, a counter-revolutionary group fighting against the Sandinistas to return the corrupt US-backed Somoza regime to power in Nicaragua). Dunne wants to look at using the Expert Advisory Committee on Drugs to offer the kind of government-endorsed guidelines existing for standard alcohol drinks and safe consumption and apply it to more serious drugs. Historically the success of the government-backed needle exchange programme providing sterile for intravenous drug users dramatically reducing the rate of HIV and Hepatitis C infections, and is an excellent example of a common sense approach to the problems of illegal drug use. While some may view the government dishing out of tips on how to get high safely as cynical and degenerate, surely this is a health issue rather than a moral one? Dunne's suggestion that the Government might support a drug-checking service at night club and festival venues, where users can have their pills and liquids tested, is enlightened and would protect young experimenters. On the flip side, in the law of unintended consequences it could be argued that drugchecking services might encourage indulgence in drug use because it had a government testing safety net. However illegal substances are here to stay so it is better to try and remove recreational users from a dangerous demimonde where the user swallows, snorts or injects at their own uneducated risk. Drugs, for some, is a quick term loan of the spirit while for others it can be a heavy mortgage of the soul. The government risk is that if it is seen to condone illegal drug use it would be hard to argue how any state advisers would want to be seen shaking hands with the devil that is methamphetamine, aka P. That pernicious, highly addictive drug should in an ideal world fall outside any umbrella but because all illegal drugs are an unknown recipe for disaster if P was found to be evident in party drugs such as ecstasy, one would 'hazard' a guess that most users would choose not to take it. Logically it would be a case of better the devil you know than the devil that hadn't been tested. Dunne's proposal for government guidelines is welcome and unexpected from a Government that has, along with previous administrations, removed all support from rehabilitation treatment centres such as the world renowned facility at Hanmer Springs. Better to be at the top of the cliff offering expert advice than carting off the comatose corpses at the bottom. The best of all progressive ideas is the one that is provocative. Bring it on. - --- MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom