Pubdate: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 Source: Appeal-Democrat (Marysville, CA) Copyright: 2016 Appeal-Democrat Contact: https://appeal-democrat-dot-com.bloxcms-ny1.com/site/forms/online_services/letter/ Website: http://www.appeal-democrat.com Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/1343 VOTERS WILL DO MORE THAN CONSIDER THE WORDING OF INITIATIVES They're Going to Consider the Characters Asking for Their Approval on Medical Marijuana Laws Some marijuana enthusiasts (whether they're legitimate users/growers or not) seem to think that they're entitled to grow and use marijuana as they see fit and that laws restricting them in any way are not real laws. And they also seem to believe that if everything were up for a vote, their side would win by a landslide. We think they're wrong on both counts, and we believe that if they want public opinion on their side, they've got a lot of work and convincing to do. Unfortunately for those medical marijuana supporters who want to legitimately use it and cultivate it in a responsible manner, the rowdy crowd at Tuesday's Yuba County Supervisor's meeting did them a disservice. Even if you're a libertarian leaning, don't-really-care-about-pot-just-keep-it-under-control sort of thinker on the issue of marijuana cultivation, you're going to think twice about falling into step with the yellers and finger-waggers. Medical marijuana supporters gave supervisors a pretty hard time Tuesday. And we don't actually know if those who were spewing at the meeting were truly advocates of a reasonable medical marijuana ordinance for Yuba County, or just pot growers in general who liked having a more liberal ordinance to blend in with. (Supervisors radically changed the county cultivation ordinance early last year - it had allowed a fairly liberal amount to be grown outdoors; now it allows no outdoor grows.) Tuesday, supervisors were considering whether to move local initiatives to liberalize the cultivation ordinance and to allow dispensaries in the county onto the June ballot. A snarky bunch disrupted the supervisors meeting to the point that most of the supervisors got up and took a recess to get away from the vitriol. The protesters would have preferred the supervisors just vote to adopt the initiatives and change the law immediately. It was reported that four of the five supervisors walked out of the board chambers "amid a barrage of vitriolic catcalls from marijuana supporters." Brook Hilton, a member of the Yuba Patients Coalition, in favor of the initiatives, spoke to the crowd during that 20-minute break. "I understand your feelings," Hilton said. "But this is out of order and isn't going to get us any place." Upon their return, supervisors voted to send the two cannabis-related initiatives to the voters. Some of the protesters were indignant that supervisors didn't acquiesce. Why, we're not sure since all five of the supervisors had favored the more stringent pot growing ordinance and all five were elected by a majority of voters in their districts and they all feel they represent the values of their constituencies, why would you expect them to buckle under? Our advice to the real medical marijuana practitioners and those who would like to legitimately grow medical marijuana and/or have it available at dispensaries: Plan out some events and demonstrations where your side is polite, logical, passionate, yet reasonable. Voters aren't going to just base their decisions on the wording of the initiatives; they're going to consider the character of those asking for their votes. - --- MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom