Pubdate: Sat, 23 Jan 2016 Source: Ventura County Star (CA) Copyright: 2016 The E.W. Scripps Co. Contact: http://www.vcstar.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/479 Author: Mike Harris MOST VENTURA COUNTY CITIES MOVE TO BAN PERSONAL CULTIVATION OF MEDICAL MARIJUANA Commercial medical marijuana dispensaries are prohibited throughout Ventura County. Now, to meet a March 1 deadline under a new state law, six of the county's 10 cities - Camarillo, Fillmore, Oxnard, Port Hueneme, Thousand Oaks and Santa Paula - are rushing to go a step further by formally banning small-scale, personal cultivation of medical marijuana. The Ojai City Council will take up the issue in February, but currently forbids personal cultivation. Officials argue that they want to retain control over marijuana in their communities, while opponents contend that heavy-handed ordinances reduce patients' access to medicinal pot. Geoff Ware, Thousand Oaks' code compliance manager, said city officials believe the new prohibition is consistent with the city's character. Moorpark, Ventura and unincorporated areas of the county will continue to permit personal cultivation for qualified patients, which is allowed under the state health and safety code. The Simi Valley City Council also has introduced an ordinance that will begin permitting personal cultivation, as recommended by the city Planning Commission, said Environmental Services Director Peter Lyons. Planning Commission Chairman Scott Santino "just felt as if it was too restrictive to prohibit hospice patients from cultivation," Lyons said. Under California Proposition 215, the Compassionate Use Act of 1996 that was approved by 56 percent of California voters, cities cannot prohibit residents with a serious health condition and a physician's recommendation from using medical marijuana. According to medical marijuana advocacy group Americans for Safe Access, more than 1.4 million Californians have used the substance for chronic pain, arthritis, migraines and cancer. REGULATION ACT But the courts have ruled that cities can ban all marijuana cultivation - commercial and personal - regardless of Proposition 215. In response to the California Medical Marijuana Regulation and Safety Act, which went into effect Jan. 1, most cities in the county are adopting ordinances doing just that to the dismay of some medical marijuana users. The regulation and safety act establishes a comprehensive state licensing and regulatory framework for medical marijuana. It requires cities and counties to have land use rules that regulate or prohibit commercial medical marijuana uses. Cities that do not have such ordinances in place by March 1 will lose the authority to do so. The state Department of Food and Agriculture will then be the sole licensing authority. And thus local cities and the county are scrambling to formalize, clarify and update their bans on the commercial cultivation, processing, distribution and delivery of medical marijuana. The Fillmore City Council this month adopted a 45-day urgency measure banning medical marijuana's sale and cultivation - including personal, said City Manager Dave Rowlands. "Several California cities have reported negative impacts of marijuana cultivation, processing and distribution activities, including but not limited to offensive odors, criminal activity, including violent robberies ... and public health concerns, including fire hazards and problems associated with mold, fungus and pests," states Fillmore's staff report. The Moorpark and Port Hueneme city councils adopted their ordinances this past week. The other cities' ordinances, plus the county's, have been introduced and are expected to be adopted by the March 1 deadline. Before the introduction of the ordinances, many of the cities had de facto bans under "permissive zoning" land use regulations that did not expressively list dispensaries and commercial cultivation as permitted uses. The new ordinances will expressly forbid such operations. Moorpark's Municipal Code has never addressed personal cultivation, and thus the practice is not expressly prohibited. It will continue to be permitted under the new ordinance. The Moorpark City Council on Wednesday also introduced a second ordinance to allow deliveries of medical marijuana to a qualified patient by a primary caregiver. It will be considered for adoption Feb. 3. Delivery will continue to be permitted in unincorporated areas of the county. Some cities, including Santa Paula and Thousand Oaks, say that once their ordinances are in place, they may revisit the bans and take a more nuanced, less restrictive approach without the threat of a state-imposed deadline. SOME OPPOSITION Some of the ordinances, such as Simi Valley's, were introduced this month without opposition from the public. Others, like those in Ventura and Thousand Oaks, drew considerable opposition. Thousand Oaks resident Shari Sanders told the council she uses marijuana daily to help relieve chronic pain from a variety of ailments, including reflex sympathetic dystrophy syndrome. "The main reason I'm against the ordinance is because it goes beyond commercial - it attacks personal cultivation," Sanders, 56, said in an interview. "Someone who is unable to leave their home and is very ill and they have limited income and they can't afford it. And now they're going to have to risk being turned into a criminal if they want to get a little plant to grow their own." Sanders said she doesn't personally cultivate marijuana, but buys it from a dispensary in Los Angeles. Locally, Santa Barbara has legal dispensaries, too. Sanders said that before she became ill a decade ago, she had been anti-marijuana, even divorcing her first husband in 1983 because he was a "pot-head and I didn't like it." Chelsea Sutula, president of the Ventura-based Sespe Creek Collective, which delivers medical marijuana throughout Ventura County, also opposes the ordinances. "There are thousands of qualified, compliant patients using cannabis for medical purposes in the county and none of these bans are drawn up with any of their concerns in mind," she said. While the collective says it's a nonprofit and hence compliant with Prop. 215 and the state's subsequent Medical Marijuana Program Act, the proposed local delivery bans would threaten its business. On its website, the collective urges its customers to proactively oppose the ordinances. Bert Perello was one of two Oxnard council members to vote against introducing that city's ordinance this month. "I want to be clear: I'm not for recreational use of an identified drug such as marijuana," he said in an interview. "But I am for allowing people to use cannabis for relief of medical issues. That's why I felt I had to vote that way." He said he has no problem with qualified patients personally cultivating medical marijuana under health and safety code guidelines. The code allows patients with a serious health condition, a valid state-issued medical marijuana identification card and a physician's recommendation to possess 8 ounces of dried marijuana and to maintain six mature or 12 immature marijuana plants for personal medical use. REVISITING BANS Fillmore may yet allow personal cultivation, Rowlands said. Now that the urgency measure is in place, the city's Planning Commission will consider a permanent ordinance, he said. "A recommendation will be made to the City Council, which may or may not allow personal cultivation," he said. "The council has not yet addressed this issue."Ventura County's few legal medical marijuana cooperatives will not be impacted by the local ordinances, said Ventura County Sheriff's Capt. Curt Rothschiller. The cooperatives are permitted to operate under guidelines of the Medical Marijuana Program Act, which in 2003 clarified Prop. 215. The sheriff's office raided the Shangri La Care medical marijuana cooperative in Ojai in October as part of what Rothschiller said this month was still an open investigation into alleged violations of the guidelines. Shangri La denies any wrongdoing. Thousand Oaks, meanwhile, has a business that evaluates patients for medical marijuana recommendations. It's classified as a medical office, which is allowed under current zoning. City staff is recommending it be allowed to remain classified as a medical office. - --- MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom