Pubdate: Thu, 04 Feb 2016 Source: Rutland Herald (VT) Copyright: 2016 Rutland Herald Contact: http://www.rutlandherald.com Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/892 Author: Paul Parker Note: Dr. Paul Parker is a pediatrician in Richmond. He is former medical director of the Woodside Juvenile Rehabilitation Center. DON'T MAKE POT PROBLEM WORSE Legalization of recreational marijuana use would be to the definite detriment of Vermonters. The pending bill proposing to do so should be resolutely rejected. It is a flawed perception that marijuana "just isn't that bad." Medical science has shown that there are multiple deleterious effects of marijuana, among which are the following: 1) Marijuana use has been shown to be associated with the development of mental health illness including depression, anxiety and paranoia. 2) Marijuana has been shown to cause problems with memory. This can have devastating impacts on a student's academic performance, future work or study opportunities. Work performance among those employed is also likely to be impacted negatively. 3) There is a well known detrimental effect on motivation caused by marijuana use, termed the "amotivational syndrome." Habitual marijuana users develop apathy and, again, school and work performance suffer. 4) Marijuana can cause psychological addiction. Users of marijuana are more likely to try even more harmful and addictive drugs in pursuit of getting high. Why would we legalize something that has the potential to promote even more drug abuse? 5) Marijuana use has been shown to impair the reflexes and judgment necessary for the safe operation of a motor vehicle. Legalization of another substance impairing drivers will lead to even more motor vehicle accidents and deaths. 6) Though not yet definitively shown to be the case, I am confident that smoking marijuana will eventually be shown to be a cause of lung disease, including cancer, emphysema and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Anything smoked is bound to cause cellular damage, which in turn leads to airway damage and, likely, cancer. 7) There are well-known endocrine effects of marijuana. Specifically, it interferes with the expression of testosterone, leading to gynecomastia (breast enlargement) and possibly testicular atrophy in males, heavy users being the most susceptible to these effects. 8). There are many other unanswered questions regarding the safety of marijuana. For instance, what is the effect on a fetus' brain and neuro-developmental outcome when a woman uses marijuana during pregnancy? It is highly plausible that long-term damage to the child will be the result. The deleterious mental, physical and cognitive effects of marijuana use are indisputable. Anyone who argues to the contrary is in serious denial, or ignorant. If recreational use of marijuana is legalized in Vermont, marijuana will be much more available to our youth. It is not at all difficult for youth to obtain cigarettes, chew tobacco or alcohol when these are present in their households. It will be the same for marijuana. States where recreational marijuana use has been legalized are experiencing an alarming increase in toxic ingestions among children and youth. This is typically in the form of "edibles." This will be an inevitable outcome for Vermont children and youth as well. What message would we be sending to our children by legalizing marijuana use? Do we want to send the message that smoking or ingesting marijuana is OK, when it clearly isn't? Isn't that, in essence, what our state would be communicating to them by passing a bill legitimizing and legalizing its use? With an increase in availability, there will be an inevitable increase in use. Vermonters need to learn from the mistakes of other states, not emulate them. Arguments for legalization of recreational use of marijuana should not be confused with those for legalization of marijuana for medical uses. Research as to possible medical uses of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC - the active ingredient in marijuana) is ongoing but in its infancy. (I do believe that more needs to be done to promote delivery modes that don't include smoking it. Smoking marijuana is never a good idea for any reason.) Arguments that promote legalization of recreational marijuana use based on the current status of alcohol in our society are irrational. Alcohol abuse over the centuries has resulted in untold tragedies. The list of ills associated with alcohol abuse is daunting: alcohol dependence, cirrhosis, birth defects (fetal alcohol syndrome), drunken driving and other causes of accidental death, spousal and child abuse, rape, loss of worker productivity, among others. One cannot rationally argue that marijuana use should be legalized just because alcohol use is legal. Two bads don't make a good. Much has been made of the idea that legalization/regulation is better than prohibition. Prohibition of alcohol failed as a policy because just about anybody with a bathtub could produce it. Prohibition of marijuana production, possession and use discourages individuals from using it. Prohibition has an impact on ease of access and therefore on prevalence of use. As a society, we prohibit all sorts of acts that are deleterious to society as a whole. We prohibit drunken driving, stealing, cheating on taxes. This does not stop people from doing these things, but there are consequences for these actions if these individuals are caught doing them. Prohibition serves as a deterrent. Widespread use of marijuana results in multiple societal ills, hence society should prohibit its use. Let's look at the example of opioids. Opioid use is legal as long as one has a prescription from a doctor (though not for recreational use). Opioid distribution is regulated, though one may argue (and I agree) that it has not been regulated well enough. Despite being legal and regulated, we have an epidemic of abuse. Why? Because opioids are widely available in people's homes. With increased availability there is increased use, leading to increased addiction and increased demand. This same scenario will play out if marijuana is legalized. Is marijuana use as bad as illicit opioid use? Certainly not, but, again, that doesn't make marijuana use good. And where do legalization proponents/prohibition opponents stop? Do we move on to legalizing heroin? Cocaine? Methamphetamine? LSD? Legalization would result in more use of each of these substances. As a society we cannot afford that. As parents, we should not tolerate it. Individuals who use harmful and addictive substances ultimately cause harm to society on the whole. It is not just about the individual. Impaired individuals hurt others - on the road, in the home and in the womb. Impaired individuals hurt themselves. Society ultimately pays for this - in physical and mental health expenditures, impaired worker productivity, impaired student learning. People who use harmful and addictive drugs don't just hurt themselves, they hurt everyone around them. Though I am not well versed in the tax revenue figures, proponents of legalization assert the State of Vermont will glean from passage of a legalization bill. I can attest that it will pale in comparison to the long-term enormous cost to the state. I personally don't know any medical professionals, substance abuse counselors or law enforcement agents who believe that it is a good idea to legalize recreational use of marijuana. To whom are legislators listening then? Unfortunately, some legislators have a track record of not listening to the scientists and experts on scientific topics ranging from treatment of Lyme disease to the necessity of immunizing our children (though fortunately they finally got that one right). State legislators need to listen to the medical, mental health and law enforcement experts and not the very vocal marijuana legalization lobby. No matter how you cut it, whether it be considering the safety of our children, the safety of our roads, prevalence of drug abuse, general and mental health considerations, or long-term fiscal repercussions, a bill legalizing recreational use of marijuana is a very bad idea for Vermonters. Only producers and sellers of marijuana will benefit. Habitual users will find access much enhanced, which will be to their own detriment. Vermonters on the whole will suffer a whole array of undesirable consequences. - --- MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom