Pubdate: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 Source: Appeal-Democrat (Marysville, CA) Copyright: 2016 Appeal-Democrat Contact: https://appeal-democrat-dot-com.bloxcms-ny1.com/site/forms/online_services/letter/ Website: http://www.appeal-democrat.com Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/1343 Author: Eric Vodden MEDICAL MARIJUANA RULES VARY - AND MAY CHANGE Medical marijuana cultivation and dispensaries are governed by a sometimes-confusing smorgasbord of rules and regulations that differ from county to county and city to city. Now there are four pieces of approved state legislation to add to the mix, including a cleanup bill signed last week by Gov. Jerry Brown that makes corrections to the earlier-approved bills. Add to that the prospect of multiple statewide ballot initiatives in November and the result is a lot of uncertainty over the future of medical marijuana cultivation and dispensaries, locally and statewide. Thus far, state bills have left intact the ability of cities and counties to enact ordinances regulating marijuana cultivation and dispensaries. Approved state legislation reflects more of a collaborative effort between the state and local entities than one that is in conflict. "This legislation does not affect locals' ability to regulate cultivation and includes the right for locals to enact outright bans," said Assemblyman James Gallagher, R-Plumas Lake. "They can outlaw dispensaries, which is a land-use decision." The gist of state legislation is to create a licensing system to regulate personal grows and dispensaries. Most notably, it establishes a Bureau of Medical Marijuana Regulation within the state Department of Consumer Affairs. The new bureau will have authority to issue state licenses, conduct and regulate investigations, impose fines and penalties, and collect fees over and above what is collected locally. There are requirements on various state agencies to develop licensing, pesticide, production and water diversion standards. "But first growers have to meet the local regulations, and if the locals say they can't do it, they can't do it," Gallagher said. That means anybody seeking to open a dispensary must comply with local and state ordinances, and where appropriate, acquire state and local licenses. The Marysville City Council last month adopted a ban on indoor and outdoor marijuana cultivation in the face of a state-imposed March 1 deadline. The deadline was included in state legislation passed last year requiring jurisdictions that don't have cultivation ordinances to do so by the deadline or risk losing local control. Facing the deadline, Marysville, the only Yuba-Sutter jurisdiction without cultivation regulations, was one of several cities and counties that passed growing bans before March 1. But the legislation signed last week by Brown removed the deadline. Marysville Mayor Ricky Samayoa said Friday he doesn't envision the council revisiting the cultivation ordinance, as some audience members requested during last month's public hearing. It was anticipated at that time that the deadline would be removed. "The cultivation ordinance is going to stay," Samayoa said. "I will always be open to listening, but I think we should all be agreeable with what we did." The Marysville council also approved a separate ordinance allowing two dispensaries in the city, the only local jurisdiction to allow such facilities. That could change if voters approve a Yuba County dispensary initiative in June, but for now Marysville will be alone in allowing dispensaries when its ordinance takes effect Feb. 18. Samayoa said the decision was prompted by patients needing a place to purchase medical cannabis, a desire to stay ahead of state legislation and a need for revenue sources for the financially struggling city. "There's a little bit from all those things," Samayoa said. "There has been an interest in the city about it for a long time. But there hasn't been the will from previous councils. We have to let the ordinance play out and see how it works." The wild card in local control is in what will happen when statewide cannabis measures hit the November general election ballot. Insiders point to a proposed initiative backed last week by the California Medical Association to be the one most likely to make it to the ballot. It would legalize recreational use of marijuana, but is only one of a dozen similar proposals approved to collect signatures for the statewide ballot. How those measures would affect local control remains to be seen, though insiders say most appear to leave intact the ability of local cultivation and dispensary control. "I want to be sure that locals retain their authority, including banning dispensaries and cultivation if that community believes that is for the best," said Gallagher. - --- MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom