Pubdate: Wed, 18 May 2016 Source: Press-Enterprise (Riverside, CA) Copyright: 2016 The Press-Enterprise Company Contact: http://www.pe.com/localnews/opinion/letters_form.html Website: http://www.pe.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/830 S.B. NEEDS NEW APPROACH TO POT Nearly two years ago, San Bernardino City Attorney Gary Saenz laid the foundation for a long-needed discussion about medical marijuana dispensaries in the bankrupt city. The establishments, which are banned in the city, have nevertheless proliferated throughout San Bernardino, without regulations or controls. For years, the city has found itself in a high-cost, low-reward game of legal whack-a-mole, in which new dispensaries spring up whenever others are shut down. Recognizing the "futility and high cost of attempting to completely eradicate marijuana dispensaries," as Mr. Saenz put it at the time, the City Council was finally set to discuss the issue a year and half ago before the item inexplicably was removed from the city's agenda. Over the past month, the matter has finally been revived, thanks to the council's legislative review committee, chaired by Councilman John Valdivia and including Councilmen Henry Nickel and Benito Barrios. So far, however, their proposals have been shot down by their colleagues. On May 2, a proposal to allow the group to go on a fact-finding trip to learn from other cities across the state was vetoed by Mayor Carey Davis, who argued there were more cost-effective means of gathering information. On Monday, the council was set to discuss the issue and perhaps solicit the services of a polling firm to gauge public attitudes on regulating marijuana. But as soon as the subject came up for discussion, Councilman Fred Shorett, joined by James Mulvihill, Virginia Marquez and Bessine Richard, moved to table the agenda item. Mr. Shorett argued it might be better to wait until voters in November weigh in on the statewide legalization of recreational marijuana, rather than conducting a poll. For the sake of the city's finances, we hope city officials continue to at least discuss the issue. After all, as recently reported by the San Bernardino Sun, the recent closure of a dispensary on Kendall Drive cost taxpayers upward of $100,000 in personnel costs. Rather than continuing to squander finite resources in a fruitless battle, the city ought to consider following the lead of cities like Palm Springs. Faced with a similar problem of uncontrolled dispensaries operating throughout the city, Palm Springs decided to allow a limited number of regulated, taxpaying dispensaries. Ever since, the city has generated up to a million dollars in annual revenue, and the number of illegal dispensaries has plummeted. Throughout its years in bankruptcy, San Bernardino has proven itself capable of reforming how it operates. This is an opportunity to stop wasting limited resources and perhaps make money for the city. - --- MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom