Pubdate: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 Source: Orange County Register, The (CA) Copyright: 2016 The Orange County Register Contact: http://www.ocregister.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/321 Author: Don Thompson, The Associated Press DRUG USE APPEARS TO RISE AT PRISONS GUARDING AGAINST IT SACRAMENTO (AP) - Drug use behind bars appears to have increased since California started using drug-sniffing dogs and machinery to try to stop smuggling at state prisons, where overdose deaths are nearly five times the national rate, records show. It's unclear exactly why things haven't gone as officials projected. Some say the testing can yield artificially high results. Others say it's too soon to draw any long-term conclusions. Still more say the program simply is not working. Prison officials won't divulge details on results of the multimillion-dollar program. After The Associated Press reported a year ago that the department couldn't demonstrate the program's effectiveness, officials said they would look for a decline in positive drug tests, overdose deaths, suicides and violent incidents, and increased participation in rehabilitation programs. Instead, detected drug use rose from 5.5 percent before the program began to 7.3 percent of inmates who were tested in the first year in eight of the 11 prisons where California added drug-sniffing dogs and drug-detecting scanners, according to data provided to the AP. Drug use spiked at the three prisons with the most intensive drug interdiction programs, which include full-body scanners and surveillance cameras in visiting rooms. Positive tests jumped from 10.5 percent before the program to 13.9 percent in the first six months before dropping to 11.5 percent in the second six months still higher than before the program began in early 2014. Despite repeated requests, officials said they couldn't provide any of the data they said would show improvement. Weeks after AP requests, they gave a portion of the information to the nonpartisan Legislative Analyst's Office, which gave it to the AP and described the poor results at a legislative hearing. "The percentage of the prison population that's testing positive actually increased, so that's an indication to us that probably drug use is on the rise," analyst Aaron Edwards said. Officials said the urinalysis data could be artificially high because it includes inmates who refuse to take tests and also inmates who have been retested after initially testing positive. Corrections department spokeswoman Vicky Waters said it is premature to draw any conclusions because the early data cover a period before the prevention measures were fully in place at all 11 prisons. One major goal was to reduce prison violence, and that didn't happen either. Violent incidents dropped about 4 percent across the prison system in the first year but jumped more than 5 percent at the three prisons with the most intensive drug-detection programs. They increased slightly at the other eight prisons that added anti-smuggling measures, a legislative analysis showed. Prison lockdowns after riots decreased statewide but dropped significantly more at prisons without the intensive programs. The bad news prompted state lawmakers to cancel a planned expansion of the program that would have cost nearly $8 million. The decision came after the department spent $10.2 million on the airport-style scanners and other measures over two years, in addition to the $3 million it already spent annually on drug-sniffing dogs. "We gave them a chance to do this pilot (program) and we didn't get results," said Sen. Jim Beall, D-San Jose. The Legislature ultimately agreed to provide about $5 million to continue the anti-smuggling program for a year, with no expansion, until an independent study is completed. - --- MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom