Pubdate: Wed, 06 Jul 2016 Source: Montreal Gazette (CN QU) Page: A6 Copyright: 2016 Postmedia Network Inc. Contact: http://www.montrealgazette.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/274 Author: Marcus A. Sibley Note: Marcus A. Sibley is a doctoral student in the department of Law and Legal Studies at Carleton University. His research largely focuses on gendered-based violence and processes of criminal regulation in Canada. MARIJUANA TASK FORCE SHOULD RECOMMEND IMMEDIATE DECRIMINALIZATION It's not right to give people criminal records for an act soon to be legal, Marcus A. Sibley says. The Liberal government has appointed a nine-member task force that will develop recommendations for a comprehensive plan on marijuana legalization and regulation. The move to research and invest in sensible marijuana reform comes at a time when minor possession offences continue to be enforced and police raids on unlicensed pot shops have expanded across the country. Unfortunately, the government has rejected the possibility of immediately decriminalizing marijuana possession. Decriminalization is not full legalization, but it would eliminate criminal penalty for marijuana-related offences and relieve the strain on an already over-utilized criminal justice system. The decision to appoint this task force without immediately decriminalizing possession not only flies in the face of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's mandate to implement meaningful moves toward "evidence-based policy," it also betrays the cannabis culture Canadians have cultivated over the last 30 years. Instead, the government maintains that taking the time to develop a plan to control marijuana distribution and sales through a legalized framework - without temporary decriminalization - better suits the concerns of Canadians. It suggests that the current legal infrastructure, which saw significant expansion under the government of Stephen Harper, can provide meaningful protections against organized crime and illegal pot sales. This decision to continue enforcing marijuana offences encourages police to be heavy-handed in their enforcement while providing virtually no added safeguards to ensure that marijuana stays out of the hands of minors - a primary goal of Trudeau's campaign toward legalization. "Quite frankly, until those laws are repealed by Parliament through the appropriate processes, they should be upheld, they should be obeyed," argues MP and former Toronto police chief Bill Blair. Blair's comments are in reference to the growing number of unlicensed dispensaries, suggesting they are "reckless" and capitalizing on an ambiguous political climate to make a "quick buck" among recreational and other "unregulated" users. Blair's position presupposes that sales of illegal substances will skyrocket without the threat of criminal enforcement, though there is little evidence to support this. In their book, Killer Weed, Susan Boyd (a member of the task force) and Connie Carter argue that this understanding of decriminalization is misleading, suggesting instead that countries that have moved toward decriminalizing recreational drugs saw virtually no rise in drug use while also experiencing significant reductions in prison overcrowding. It seems there is a fundamental disconnect between the Liberal government's stance on pot versus what it is actually happening on the ground. Both Trudeau and Blair have suggested they are uncomfortable with the prospect that immediate decriminalization would make it easier for organized criminals to profit from marijuana sales. Their discomfort, however, evidently does not extend to the fact that countless non-violent cannabis users continue to face criminal records for an act that is soon to be legal. Charging non-violent cannabis users and small storefront dispensaries with criminal sanction seems antithetical to this supposed ideological shift toward a seemingly softer, evidence-based approach to crime control. Rejecting the possibility of decriminalization before the task force has even had a chance to meet radically undermines the kinds of political interventions experts can make, especially when there has been a great deal of research in the field of drug policy. The first and most important recommendation of the newly appointed task force should be to immediately decriminalize marijuana, removing the stigmas of criminal sanction and embracing an ethos of compassion toward cannabis users. The interim solution should not default to continued police enforcement and punitive sanctions. While some police departments have refused to lay charges for possession, others continue to unevenly enforce the laws against some of their communities' most marginalized groups. With an estimated $1.2 billion spent annually on marijuana enforcement, ruined lives bear the cost when we privilege punishment over evidence-based reforms. - --- MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom